The presence of alcohol in sufficient quantities in the blood is enough to prove impairment.
Marijuana, however, wears off. The presence of biometric markers in the blood DO NOT prove impairment.
However, I have faith that the powers that be will be able to invent an objective test that shows marijuana impairment.
Thanks for posting this reality re measuring pot use.
“The presence of alcohol in sufficient quantities in the blood is enough to prove impairment.
Marijuana, however, wears off. The presence of biometric markers in the blood DO NOT prove impairment.
However, I have faith that the powers that be will be able to invent an objective test that shows “marijuana impairment.”
objective test to see if someone is high you say?? wave a bag of cheetos around in front of them and see if they can follow it.. literally. open the bag, if they eat the whole bag, they’re high.
Just like the Covid tests the same powers that be invented? When the significant problem of not being able to prove impairment with a product as common, legal or not, as pot, has been around for as long as this problem cheap easy short term solutions are NOT a good bet. Just like the left's green wet dream isn't a good bet. The way alcohol impairment was judged prior to blood tests and breathalyzers may be the only option and there were major problems with that.