Skip to comments.
Supreme Court poised to end ‘constitutional revolution’ that’s marred US governance for 40 years
NYPost ^
| 1/14/24
| Thomas M. Boyd
Posted on 01/14/2024 5:34:28 PM PST by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: Maelstrom
Whoops!
Thx for the correction...
Old age strikes again...☹
41
posted on
01/15/2024 10:57:30 AM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: CFW
“I worry about Amy Barrett and Kavanaugh on this one though.”
Exactly. Those are two hacks that won’t want to give up their power to “legislate” politically on so many different regulations that are enacted without representation. If they follow the constitution then the entire regulatory structure of the US changes overnight. Tons of existing so called “Laws” From all of those federal departments would go away just like that. So they will not follow the constitution.
42
posted on
01/15/2024 12:23:55 PM PST
by
Revel
To: CFW
How, in all creation, could such a law come into existence.? And why would it take all these years to kill the horrible thing.?
43
posted on
01/15/2024 1:12:17 PM PST
by
unread
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC..!)
To: KarlInOhio
Although that was an awful decision, it was fun the day it was issued with Democratic Underground cursing all the Republican Supreme Court justices who voted for it before they realized that the decision came from the Democrats on the court. Then they went into a flurry of cognitive dissonance.
The absolute hysteria blaming it on the right was indeed amusing for quite some time as they ran back and forth trying to decide whether to condemn it or justify it.
44
posted on
01/15/2024 3:20:52 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: unread
How, in all creation, could such a law come into existence.?
It can't...it's merely a dictate by the courts, creating legislative power in the Executive branch. It violates the very first sentence in the Constitution, AI Section 1. There is no legitimate argument that a court decision can override the most fundamental aspect of the Constitution.
45
posted on
01/15/2024 7:55:44 PM PST
by
rottndog
(What comes after America?)
To: CFW
Have been reading how leftists are trying to force Justice Gorsuch to recuse himself from the Chevron deference case due to his long term friendships with the oil company management.
Besides the friend relationship lefties' main complaint was that millions of Americans are employed by the fed govt, like that is an argument. Precisely. And boo hoo. I bet some will be collecting a paycheck while they try to disrupt Trump's next administration.
They will try anything to hold on to power for the administrative state.
46
posted on
01/16/2024 1:44:32 PM PST
by
LurkedLongEnough
(Loretta Lynch did not review the above comments)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson