Why is it controversial when a church, temple, etc. is built over a mosque, but not the reverse?
That was my guess as well. Muslims do what Muslims do. Desecrate someone else’s religious sites.
Yes, the Muslims desecrated an old Hindu site when they conquered India. Good for the Indians.
If all the worshiped gods of the people of earth, which ones would be pleased and amazed with us for gathering gold, silver and precious stones into one place?
I can only imagine Jesus’s reaction to the wasteful opulence and of the Vatican and other “churches” around the world. I think he is gonna be pissed at how stupid most of us have been.
Oooooh. Swastikas on public display! Germans are gonna be pissed too.
And on what ruined temple did the Mughals build their mosque? It’s hard to fathom, but the death toll in World War II pales in comparison with what Muslims inflicted during their conquest and rule of India.
GOOD.
Apparently, Modi considers himself so holy that he feels empowered to inagurate a major temple on his own. There were no Hindu priests in attendance, and Modi excluded pretty much everyone of significance in the Central Government, as well as the Chief Minister for the state where the temple is built. He is putting on a show for the upcoming election in March.
Needless to say, his arrogance has ticked off a huge number of people, including senior members of his own party. It remains to be seen whether this will finally be enough to put a dent in the “Modi Magic”.
Oh, and PS the new temple isn’t actually on the site of the Babri Masjid that Modi had torn down. It’s about 4km away.
Now do Hagia Sophia and raze every mosque in the Christian world.