Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12; All

“The U.K. meets the NATO goal.”


That’s the point !

The UK actually meets the supposed goal, and it is still a shambles.


37 posted on 02/04/2024 2:48:27 PM PST by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Reverend Wright

It wasn’t the point, it was a fact correction, settle down.


38 posted on 02/04/2024 2:55:51 PM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Reverend Wright; Worldtraveler once upon a time; ansel12; Drew68

Is there any evidence that a “NATO goal” of 2% has any real-world value?

I mean, if the Royal Navy is to go on and fight in a contested environment, maybe 2% is a joke. Maybe they need 10%, or 20%.

Those huge targets (HMS QE II and HMS PoW) don’t have escort forces sufficient to protect them. What’s the Senior Service plan if one of them is sunk? Or both of them?

This “NATO target” nonsense is just that. It has no relevance to real-world dangers, it’s a BS number made up by some bureaucrat somewhere.


44 posted on 02/04/2024 4:03:47 PM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson