Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZOOKER

Camilla will be protected. Charles will have already seen to that. The former Queen Mother was the former Queen. She was used to a high level of public appearances and interactions. Camilla is mother and grandmother of a close family. Her focus is Charles, outside of her descendants, and it’s unlikely she would have any interest in being prominent if it wasn’t to support him. All the recent gossip has been about Elizabeth’s support for Camilla to marry Charles.


113 posted on 02/05/2024 11:15:46 AM PST by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: mairdie

Charles should have been allowed to marry Camilla in the first place back in the 70s.


171 posted on 02/05/2024 1:07:25 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: mairdie; ZOOKER
The former Queen Mother was the former Queen.

So will Camilla be, if she is widowed. Neither she nor the former Queen Mother were hereditary queens; but they each were given the title because they were married to a hereditary sovereign King.

The difference is that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was the biological mother of the sovereign Queen Elizabeth II.

Camilla, no biological nor adoptive relation to William and not married to his father during his childhood, would not be entitled to use the style "Queen Mother." Rather she would be "Camilla, Queen Dowager" or "the Dowager Queen."

236 posted on 02/05/2024 5:34:36 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson