Posted on 02/16/2024 5:40:14 AM PST by CFW
Fulton County Judge hearing Evidence on Motion to Disqualify Fani Willis - Day Two
YouTube link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAh1zCg0sXQ
Rumble link:
https://rumble.com/v4dnbvl-live-fulton-county-judge-hears-evidence-on-motion-to-disqualify-fani-willis.html
Links to Threads of Day One of Hearing:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217635/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217521/posts
Other articles regarding the testimony:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217616/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217690/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217682/posts
I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t understand this.
But it seems to me that the Bar might advise him on matters of rules and procedures, but not on how to respond to particular questions regarding a specific case.
Is he misrepresenting what the Bar told him, or did the Bar do wrong?
Fani Wade & Nathan Wade CHOSE VIOLENCE! Day 2 Disqualification Recap AND IT’S GOOD! Viva Frei Vlawg!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlhXDknUGcE
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee said he won’t rule on whether DA Fani Willis and her office should be disqualified from the case until after attorneys for both sides have a chance to present arguments, which he said would likely happen next Friday or the following week. He said during a hearing Monday that Willis could be disqualified “if evidence is produced demonstrating an actual conflict or the appearance of one.”
Willis’s team opted not to bring her back today, avoiding the spectacle of more deeply personal testimony from the district attorney.
Alan Dershowitz: There’s a plausible case for perjury
(hannity interviews greg jarrett and alan dershowitz)
fox news
2024-02-16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV0S_yFJhyY
According to Fani, her father was a very “Afrocentric” Black Panther.
“According to Fani, her father was a very ‘Afrocentric’ Black Panther.”
And also in the news: Water is wet.
“According to Fani, her father was a very ‘Afrocentric’ Black Panther.”
If these Afrocentric traitors would just go live where their hearts are, the world would be a better place.
He testified that he returned to the US after South Africa cancelled his visa.
Yeah. Even they didn’t want him.
Your comments throughout this thread are on target.
I think the State’s impeachment of Bradley might have remained in the State’s back pocket, until the Judge ordered the in camera review, at which point using bogus privilege claims to hide certain inconvenient facts had failed. Given that Bradley’s testimony had been friendly to the State, the ruthless Miss Cross “had to” destroy Bradley’s reputation to remake him into a hostile witness, giving the judge an excuse to suppress his testimony.
Whether the judge falls for this is doubtful, but ... politics.
No one seems to have noticed this, but Cross’s accusations have implications: “Wade’s law partner Bradley had sex with an employee and gave her a large amount of money; therefore, Bradley was forced out of his law firm and his testimony can’t be credited.” But Fani Willis was having sex with her contract employee and funneled large amounts of money to him. Miss Cross impeached Willis and Wade by analogy, and implied they should be forced out of office too.
imho this is a fairly good and short synopsis of the bradley testimony (minus the possibility of bradley having been blackmailed):
https://youtu.be/ZkoV_xKv-IM?si=gh_GOfupGp32_ql6
Fani interview 3 years ago when she was running for DA. She talks about her predecessor’s corruption, which sounds similar to what she is suspected of doing.
“Fani interview 3 years ago when she was running for DA. She talks about her predecessor’s corruption, which sounds similar to what she is suspected of doing.”
Fani Willis just thought that it was “her turn at the trough”.
another summary.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fani-willis-former-friend-eviscerates-relationship-timeline
this one provides some detail about willis not being responsive to a merchant subpoena:
The tension ahead of Thursday’s hearing was evident at a prior hearing, where Merchant told the judge that Wade refused to accept service of her subpoena. She also argued that the DA’s office appeared to be hiding evidence that could shed light on any alleged improprieties surrounding their romantic relationship. While the DA and county had separately turned over some requested records, a few were conspicuously missing, including two of Wade’s invoices to the county.
“Anything that we have in our possession… we have provided. There are assumptions about some things that we have that are inaccurate… we’re not trying to hide anything,” Deputy County Counsel Shalanda Macon-Jaliwa Miller assured the judge.
“Invoice 22 has been paid. Invoice 25 has been paid. So, someone has them,” an exasperated Merchant responded.
how in the world can a county DA avoid a contempt of court charge for being inadequately responsive to a subpoena?
imho mcafee is dragging his feet, and needs to be willing to hold willis in contempt with jail time, or else willis will wiggle out of justice.
standard disclaimer, my opinion only. i am not a lawyer and i do not play a lawyer on tv.
““Anything that we have in our possession… we have provided. There are assumptions about some things that we have that are inaccurate… we’re not trying to hide anything,” Deputy County Counsel Shalanda Macon-Jaliwa Miller assured the judge.”
“Invoice 22 has been paid. Invoice 25 has been paid. So, someone has them,” an exasperated Merchant responded.
So, is Shalanda Macon-Jaliwa Miller saying they paid an invoice that they do not have in their possession? In a well-run competent office (and one in which corruption is not a given), a reimbursement check would not be released unless the invoice is attached to the request. An invoice for services rendered would not be issued unless the contract for those services was included along with proof that the actual services was provided. The Fulton County commissioner’s office should take a look at the DA’s billing and payment practices.
A few years before I retired, our office switched to a totally online reimbursement application. It was so hard for me to get used to. I had to scan in the invoices and receipts, name the pdf file as required by our institution, then fill out an online form and select the correct account for reimbursement.
For instance, if an invited speaker was requesting payment, I had to include the contract, the hotel bill, the airplane ticket receipt, and include a note for the reason for their visit. I can’t believe a county wouldn’t have the same type requirements.
I can think of only one time that, when in a hurry, I failed to attach those documents of proof. My request for payment was denied.
imho (standard disclaimer, i am not a lawyer nor have i in the past practiced law in wakanda) it is textbook “appearance of impropriety.”
IOW, they cannot account for their expenditures and/or the recipients of their payments.
they have no proof that they did not misspend funds for inappropriate or illegal purposes.
By the way, Ms. Boom-Shakalaka seems to have been promoted to a judgeship.
Which reminds me, I have come up with a term of endearment for our favorite all-star jurist, “Princess DIE.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.