Posted on 02/24/2024 6:07:26 AM PST by Twotone
Did you know that if you have ever lived in another state, you could STILL be on that state's voter rolls?
Even IF you haven't lived there in years.
Surprised?
Inaccurate voter rolls destroy election integrity! Here's an easy way to make sure you're registered and ready to go.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsletter.truethevote.org ...
You might go to the DMV website for that state and see if they’ve got your license number.
Oh dear god.
AP News is not a credible source for conservatives. What is missing is the court trial in GA where a pen from the state attorney was used in court to 'unlock' a voting machine and change the count of votes.
“Are you certain this is not a scam to get your personal info?”
A cursory examination would have provided you the answer you seek. The TTV link takes you to an integrated map of the U.S.
You click on the state where you used to live, and it takes you to that state’s Secretary of State Voter Registration page. You click the, “Am I registered” tab within the State’s site and enter your old address.
It will tell you if you are still registered at your old address. Further examination will let you know if there have been votes cast in your name since you moved.
It’s really just assisting you in taking care of your own business.
AP may not be reliable for conservatives, that doesn’t mean the story isn’t true, look it up, quite a few news outlets are all reporting the same thing, the voting machine issue is entirely separate story than taking about TTV
“I’m a little skeptical about TTV in the aftermath of the movie 2000 Mules. It may have happened...]
Your skepticism makes me question whether you even watched 2000 mules. The video of countless ballot stuffers and the cell phone geotracking provided irrefutable evidence of massive election fraud.
I guess if you can’t be convinced with your own eyes, there’s just no convincing you.
> When my mother passed, I took a copy of the death certificate to city hall and made sure her name was removed. <
I did the same. Then two years later, I checked while at the polling station. By golly, her name was still there.
I put up a fuss. And at the next election her name was finally gone.
Watched it multiple times and it showed people showing up a drop boxes at strange times and dropping multiple ballots in, it certainly looked illegal which I already mentioned but the one thing they failed to show was the same person going to multiple drop boxes and dropping off multiple ballots
If you read the article I posted the law in Georgia allows one person to drop off multiple ballots for family members in 2000 mules every indication is they were cheating but without video of the same person dropping off ballots in different locations it’s impossible to prove and TTV said they had the information and so far have failed to show it
I watched it, it makes a strong argument but for me I needed more to close the deal. I am skeptical by nature and if it’s something where I like the result even more so!
Remember you are the easiest person to fool particularly if the event fits your bias!
When you only tell half the story, you are lying about the rest you didn't report. You didn't report the whole story, so you lied and published it anyway.
And this is what I have tried to do as a Freeper, is to point out the states' Voter Registration Rosters need to be cleaned and audited before every election. I found a person who commented in WA that she hasn't voted in years, but somehow the state thinks she has. It's too easy for state SoS to run a report of who didn't vote, and regress the database for the number of elections back to look, and find the people registered but not voting, and using them as 'substitute voters'.
Did TTV testify in open court that they had no evidence or not ?? We are strictly speaking about TTV and whether they said they had no evidence or not and did 2000 Mules prove the point
I would say 2000 Mules suggests illegality but offers no concrete proof because to my knowledge have never shown one person going to multiple drop boxes as they claimed they could and when under oath admitted they had no evidence
Follow up....
I’ve been trying to come up with a requirements specification for a more secure electronic voting system.( yes, it can be done)
That is a good requirement to add
If I recall correctly, the judge denied the evidence presented because the geo-location evidence wasn't 'accurate' to within a few feet of each drop box, and couldn't be used. Despite the coincidence of being stopped at several locations where a dropbox was nearby. You didn't mention it was the judge's call.
Is there a link attesting to that.
Here’s a direct quote from multiple sources about what TTV testified to.
In their written response, attorneys for True the Vote said the group had no names or other documentary evidence to share.
In this particular case, if you read the article you would know it wasn’t about denying evidence it was about what did TTV have to assist law enforcement, which testified under oath they had nothing.
You keep bringing issues that are not part of this article or discussion, this article is about TTV and did they have evidence to support their claims and they said no they didn’t under oath in a court of law.
IF they actually have evidence, then they lied to the court which is perjury which I highly doubt they did.
STOP RIGHT THERE. Grammatically incorrect - no 's' on 'quote' makes it hearsay. Quotes from multiple sources should EACH show separate ID line of authorship. 'Multiple sources' confers no intelligence on its own, let alone authority. There should be a link to the court document containing the testimony, but its a real pain to get sometimes.
what might be more believable is that further testimony would expose a surreptitious spy agency technique that they don't want exposed. And that's probably not the truth, either.
We are talking about what TTV testified to not what grammatically correct, look it up if you care to know, TTV testified under oath they had no evidence, it’s really that simple.
If TTV didn’t testify to what’s been reported, why haven’t they been vocal and in public saying all the stories are false, they haven’t said a word.
Cut it anyway you want, you are talking nonsense, either TTV testified they had nothing or they didn’t, there is not one news report from anyone or from TTV they actually have evidence and they never said in open court they had nothing.
Look at what they actually said, they never denied they said they had nothing under oath in open court.
If they had the evidence, they claim why didn’t they show it for the world to see.
At no point do they deny their court testimony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.