Posted on 02/26/2024 4:54:33 PM PST by CFW
A judge has determined that Nathan Wade’s former law partner and divorce lawyer must tell the court what he knows about the special prosecutor’s relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis – a decision that could produce more bombshell testimony as defense attorneys seek to disqualify the DA from prosecuting the Fulton County election interference case.
Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee’s chambers notified attorneys in the case by email late Monday that certain communications Terrence Bradley had with Wade are not protected by attorney-client privilege, according to numerous people who read the email. Bradley could be compelled to testify as soon as Tuesday afternoon. McAfee’s decision followed a closed-door meeting between the judge and Bradley on Monday that lasted nearly an hour and 20 minutes.
A spokesman for Willis said the DA’s office cannot comment except in court.
Defense attorneys are seeking to disqualify the entire DA’s office because of what they have called an “improper” romantic relationship between Willis and Wade. The defense attorneys say Willis benefitted financially by hiring Wade because he paid for trips they took together with money he earned from the case.
Willis and Wade have testified they split the cost of travel roughly equally. And they said their relationship began months after she hired him to oversee the case in November 2021.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
Wade and Willis...there licenses may be up for grabs. One media site kept saying it over and over...you can’t lie under oath...and she was under oath.
Bookmark
If this 3rd rate liar gets on the stand again I won’t miss it for the world. Entertainment at it’s best!
Fani ain’t quitting. She’s a Queen.
>> He’ll probably say exactly what they want him to say. Then the judge can say no relationship has been proven.
He’ll be cross-examined by some pretty sharp lawyers for the defense. And his (and Wade’s and Willis’s) perjury is obvious, even if not acknowledged just yet.
I perceive that “state” is gonna be in a world of hurt real soon.
Team Trump counting the moves until checkmate.
She’s elected...Not sure what the choices are for the judge and on what he must base his decision. No matter what...if she and Wade lied on the stand they are guilty of perjury...and that’s a crime.
Of course, normal people like us, can’t lie under oath. These people are scum sucking dirtbags. When they lie, and they will, no one will do anything about it. I know that sucks, but that is reality. But, we can still hope for the best.
FANI WILLIS UPDATE! Terrence Bradley to Take the Stand on Text Messages with Nathan Wade! Viva Frei
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDsASD6soF0
Fani Willis: Shocking Update on Pending Case Dismissal
https://www.youtube.com/live/weg3aXVJCP8?si=w6YeRi6nZagrWgFv&t=2113
..Bradley is not likely a witness with information on those calls and visits between Wade and Willis. However, opposing counsel has been trying to get Bradley to discuss disclosures made to opposing counsel before the filing of the original motion. That quickly became mired in privilege assertions...
...Bradley reported met with the judge for 80 minutes in his chamber. https://ajc.com/politics/judge-wades-law-partner-must-testify-about-relationship-with-willis/FQLTCWX75JBG7AX3O4GVWEMFHE/… I am still surprised that Wade and Willis have not voluntarily removed themselves in the interest of the case and the office.
"On Monday, Judge Scott McAfee met with Bradley. The judge notified attorneys in the case via email that some communications between Wade and Bradley do not fall under attorney-client confidentiality, sources tell ABC News.
The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday afternoon at 2 p.m."
Now we will just have to see if it is live-streamed and if so where we can watch it. I will be suspicious if streaming is not allowed and we have to rely on the media's reporting of Bradley's testimony.
imho, when bradley revisits the witness stand, mcafee needs to intervene and ask in open court if bradley is giving testimony of his own free volition or if he (bradley) is under duress (IOW, is he under threat of blackmail or some other future illegal action if he answers in certain ways and not in other certain ways).
imho, same rigamarole for wade if wade is recalled to the witness stand.
Thank you for your diligent efforts to keep us up to date on this important issue! (And others.)
Much appreciated.
>> I will be suspicious if streaming is not allowed and we have to rely on the media’s reporting of Bradley’s testimony.
Forgive me if my memory is faulty, but IIRC, according to a poster here on FR, Georgia law compels “open trials”, to include video. Streaming that video would be up to a third party.
It’ll be live streamed. That was the purpose of behind closed doors...to see what is protected and what is not.
when called as a witness...there is no such option and no such plea..You can plead the fifth or be a no show.
“Forgive me if my memory is faulty, but IIRC, according to a poster here on FR, Georgia law compels “open trials”, to include video. Streaming that video would be up to a third party.”
That’s correct. But, how often do the democrats find a way to circumvent the law?
>> But, how often do the democrats find a way to circumvent the law?
Oh, too often. Way too often.
The appeals system is the firewall. If the lawfare prevails at the local level I pray the firewall holds. I could be wrong, but I believe the Georgia lawfare will fail at the local level.
It will be live here
https://rumble.com/v4fxbl0-fani-willis-hearing-live-part-3-wades-ex-lawyer-bradley-back-on-the-stand.html
Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.