Posted on 02/28/2024 1:44:43 PM PST by CaptainK
Yes except they won’t.
Not “fixed”? Why the scare quotes? It’s fixed the minute it’s taken to Engeron, the laughing hyena behind the bench day 1. No heavy load of authority you dump in your first five sentences and first clause of the sixth obscures the fact that the dig you want to get in is the final clause.
So, if he applies for a loan, must he get a court determination of the value of the assets he uses for collateral, so that he is not deemed to have committed fraud against the great people of New York?
I would not borrow money using collateral or any financial statement that will be deemed erroneous, and therefore fraudulent by definition in New York.
What’s with all these judges with foreign names?
Foreign like Italian or Greek ?
….
It’s called “The Great Replacement”
Your analysis seems completely accurate to me - my only thing I’m unsure about is if the State would have to return the money if he is successful and the state has already partially enforced the judgment. I would assume so, but it’s not a situation I’ve been in so I can’t say for sure without research.
It’s a foregone conclusion that if Jack Smith is able to bring his case to court he will get a conviction (it will be DC jurors). It’s just a question of whether it happens before the election or not. If after the election, it could be before Jan. 20, 2025. After Jan. 3, 2025, the House may have a Democrat majority and the Senate may also have one. So it may depend on how much the Left loathes Trump’s running mate whether they try to assemble a two-thirds majority in the Senate (Democrats and RINOs) to remove him from office. Could be a shorter Presidential term than William Henry Harrison’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.