Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

I’m going to disagree with you slightly.

In my opinion, McAfee is taking this long because the primary/potential losers in this situation are prominent blacks (Wade, Willis and now Bradley) and he does not want to be accused of being unfair to them.

Had it been a white, male, straight person the trial would have been over in a hour and the poor bastard would have been driving a cement truck.


22 posted on 03/01/2024 7:33:19 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Cen-Tejas

“Had it been a white, male, straight person the trial would have been over in a hour and the poor bastard would have been driving a cement truck.”

LOL


24 posted on 03/01/2024 7:36:40 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Cen-Tejas
McAfee is taking this long because the primary/potential losers in this situation are prominent blacks (Wade, Willis and now Bradley) and he does not want to be accused of being unfair to them.

He should know better than anyone that the black ghetto culture will accept nothing less than full affirmation of Willis' corruption, whether it take 2 weeks or 2 hours.

We are not dealing with rational people.

32 posted on 03/01/2024 8:02:12 AM PST by fwdude (.When unarmed Americans are locked up for protesting a stolen election, you know it was stolen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Cen-Tejas

“Had it been a white, male, straight person the trial would have been over in a hour and the poor bastard would have been driving a cement truck.”

I think you’re right... plus, the judge is up for re-election and considering the demographics (47.72% blacks).... he is going to need the black vote to keep his job. If he fires Fani that won’t happen.

It will be a miracle if this judge does the right thing by disqualifying Willis. I just don’t see it happening, but would love to be wrong. That said, I would expect Trump’s lawyers to appeal based on the obvious conflict of interest... both with Willis’s prior connection with this judge and re: the judge’s re-election incentives.


259 posted on 03/01/2024 5:49:03 PM PST by Danie_2023 (yi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson