Its a classic straw man line of attack. She states without pushback, that President is arguing that he is above the law. Thus she pushes this narrative that any reasonable person would agree with, except its false and not what President Trump is arguing in court. He is arguing that immunity exists from (malicious) prosecution for carrying out official duties as President, namely here, expressing concern that the 2020 election included fraud enough to alter results and should be looked at thoroughly before being allowed to stand forever.
Big difference from what she is attacking him with and the main stream media democrat friends will never point that out.
But, it has been looked at thoroughly, even by Trump-appointed judges, and they've found very, very little. But no one on team Trump wants to admit that. Better to the go with the "we wuz robbed" group-think so you don't get insulted by the cultists. IDGAF, bring it.