Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Navy Patriot

Yeah well if NATO does not pay their fare share they need to GTFO


3 posted on 03/10/2024 10:52:37 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sarah Barracuda

How about we limit our NATO obligation to a maximum of no more than twice the contribution of NATO’s next largest contributor?
(instead of more than 10 times as much...)


19 posted on 03/10/2024 11:19:47 AM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sarah Barracuda
"Yeah well if NATO does not pay their fare share they need to GTFO"
NATO made sense when there was a Soviet Union. Since then NATO has become a subsidiary of the Globalists (like the United Nations). If we want to continue as a nation and not just be part of some global conglomerate like "Oceania" in 1984, we should keep NATO at arms length and have no part of it.
76 posted on 03/10/2024 6:19:25 PM PDT by Hiddigeigei (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson