To: Red Badger
She should already have dismissed with extreme prejudice.
4 posted on
03/14/2024 10:41:40 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Georgia Girl 2
She should already have dismissed with extreme prejudice. Just regular prejudice will do — it doesn’t need to be extreme. Reminds me of a line in A Few Good Men:
"I strenuously object,” is that how it works? Hmm? Objection! Overruled. No, no, I strenuously object! Oh, you strenuously object? — then I'll take some time and reconsider.
9 posted on
03/14/2024 10:52:11 AM PDT by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." — M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: Georgia Girl 2
LOL! Although I’d LOVE to see Judge Cannon pop a cap in Jack Smith’s azz... I believe cases are dismissed “with predjudice”, but not “with extreme predjudice”. 😉😂
23 posted on
03/14/2024 11:20:38 AM PDT by
Nervous Tick
("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Exactly, then Trump could sue for damages
24 posted on
03/14/2024 11:22:02 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson