There were some portions of the judge’s ruling read on FOX and by golly - there is a lot that SHOULD have made him decide the opposite of what his decision was. It’s just not logical that so much can be found to be wrong and YET...it’s a closed matter with no results...Sure has me perplexed and questioning everything anymore..
Skimming through the 23 page decision, the first thing that hits me is the numbers of case after case after case that were cited to give credence to his decision....it appears to me to be a matter of dazzling the reader with garbage to make them give up. Sure, it’s to show precedence but maybe it’s time to start fresh and to heck with precedence. I started counting the number of cases but my eyes went blurry and I gave up.
What’s the name of the class that’s taught in law school that covers that? I don’t think it’s possible to be in that profession without having learned it. It just doesn’t come natural to NORMAL people.
It’s a lot of “WE KNOW BUT” that I posted earlier...
How about - “I don’t WANT to disqualify her as I don’t want to be called a racist??”
Can we start with honesty? If we get that, integrity is part of the package.