Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

How would taxing a constitutional right to bear arms be more constitutional the. The Poll Tax, which taxed the right to vote?


2 posted on 03/20/2024 8:16:53 AM PDT by Kozak (Слава Україні Герояам Слава. RuZZia is a terrorist state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak

It’s just a property tax assessed yearly.


31 posted on 03/20/2024 3:15:56 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak
You, asking the AI thingy...
Would california be within it's right to Require Guns to Be Registered Annually, with a Fee?
Copilot

Certainly! California has introduced Senate Bill 1160 (SB 1160), which proposes annual registration of firearms within the state. Here are the key points:

  1. Registration Requirement: SB 1160 would mandate that every firearm in California be annually registered with the Department of Justice1. This means gun owners would need to provide updated information about their firearms each year.

  2. Annual Fee: As part of the registration process, gun owners would be required to pay an annual fee. The collected fees would be deposited into a special fund specifically for administering and enforcing the firearm registry1.

  3. Data Collection and Accountability: The primary goal of SB 1160 is to improve data accuracy regarding the number of firearms in private hands and their ownership. Currently, estimates exist, but this measure aims to provide more precise information. By requiring annual registration, the state can better track firearms and enhance public safety1.

  4. Notification and Enforcement: The bill also requires reasonable efforts to notify firearms dealers, owners, and the public about registration requirements. However, it’s essential to note that registration itself does not serve as evidence that a firearm is lawfully permitted or that the registrant is the lawful owner. Possession of an unregistered firearm would be considered an infraction1.

  5. Historical Context: The concept of annual firearm registration has historical roots tracing back to colonial America. It emphasizes the civic responsibility that comes with owning a firearm1.

  6. Senator Portantino’s Advocacy: Senator Anthony J. Portantino, who introduced SB 1160, has been a proponent of common-sense gun reform policies. His previous legislative efforts include authorizing local governments to restrict open carry and raising the firearm purchase age to twenty-one in California1.

  7. Fee Amount: While the exact fee amount is not specified in the bill, other sources indicate that the fee for firearm registration in California is $19 per firearm2.

In summary, California’s proposed annual firearm registration aligns with the state’s efforts to enhance accountability, data accuracy, and responsible gun ownership. However, it remains a topic of debate, and opinions may vary on whether such requirements are within the state’s rights.

 Bottom line: Even though I was enthusiastic about it with my first word, I've thought it over while generating my responce and ...Damned if I know.

34 posted on 03/20/2024 3:24:06 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson