Unfortunately, too many parents have been deceived by the claims of leftists who make such unwarranted assumptions. The case of Chloe Cole, and others like her, is one tragic example. They used fear and guilt to persuade her parents that Chloe would likely commit suicide if they did not authorize surgical mutilation of her body to make her appear to be a man. Too late, Chloe came to understand that she had never been transsexual. She wished to remain a girl. Instead of an apology, or offers of compensation, she received scorn from LGBT advocates.
To: SeekAndFind
Discriminate away! Unclean vermin....
2 posted on
03/23/2024 4:02:19 PM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: SeekAndFind
Sci Am has been junk since the mid ‘90s
To: SeekAndFind
That’s too bad. SA used to be a credible publication. Which, if any, has taken their place?
4 posted on
03/23/2024 4:03:17 PM PDT by
Fester Chugabrew
(In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
To: SeekAndFind
Scientific American has been in politicized lefty crazyland for quite a while.
5 posted on
03/23/2024 4:03:45 PM PDT by
Lee N. Field
("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
To: SeekAndFind
SA hasn’t been Scientific nor American for decades.
6 posted on
03/23/2024 4:05:53 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: SeekAndFind
I used to regularly read Scientific American, but they’re not very scientific anymore. They’ve been bitten by the leftist politics parasite, which does nothing but corrupt and destroy. And as for that email, any parent which calls its child “non-conforming” is manipulating them, because no child chooses their “sexuality” before puberty.
To: SeekAndFind
Ex-subscriber here. SA went Woke before the word was even known. One director was an early proponent of “Women’s Mathematics” - different, you see, from the male version of what is perhaps the most sexless topic in all of human learning. It’s mostly unreadable trash now and has been since the turn of the century. IMHO.
To: SeekAndFind
I canceled my Scientific American subscription many years ago for outrageous leftist bias.
9 posted on
03/23/2024 4:25:45 PM PDT by
TChad
To: SeekAndFind
Scientific American irrevocably beclowned themselves during the pandemic and forced injections.
11 posted on
03/23/2024 4:38:39 PM PDT by
Antioch
(Against stupidity even the Gods struggle in vain…)
To: SeekAndFind
13 posted on
03/23/2024 5:40:55 PM PDT by
Ge0ffrey
To: SeekAndFind
[Leading the children astray: When even Scientific American is off in crazy land, we know we’re in a real struggle to find the truth.]
We're in the Last Days; the Days of Lot. When the fundamental existence of male / female is questioned, all logic and reason are gone.
What's left is an open rebellion against Almighty God in the streets of the world. Such things do not end well.
(newer version which includes verse 32) - both images posted for effect - to wake up some small part of a dying world
15 posted on
03/23/2024 5:53:40 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: SeekAndFind
S.A. has been in the dumper since the 1990s...
16 posted on
03/23/2024 6:12:26 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
( hen we so desperately need him)
To: SeekAndFind
I spent my working career as a scientist, but I stopped subscribing to Scientific American about a decade ago. I still get Science.
19 posted on
03/23/2024 6:55:57 PM PDT by
Hiddigeigei
("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson