Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2024 10:37:42 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

This will force the Government to defend itself... which may help others down the road since it’s pretty likely this plaintiff wasn’t the only one they’ve used this tactic on.


2 posted on 03/25/2024 10:40:21 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Obama’s FBI again


3 posted on 03/25/2024 10:41:35 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I’m pretty sure the Feds would like to concoct and maintain a “No Vote” List......


4 posted on 03/25/2024 10:41:37 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Due process. How tough of a concept is that?


5 posted on 03/25/2024 10:45:07 AM PDT by DownInFlames (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Hell of a way to treat a good old mixed Irish-Italian...


7 posted on 03/25/2024 10:52:00 AM PDT by SuperLuminal ( hen we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
1. Government ruins a person's life
2. Person sues
3. Government is afraid they might lose the case
4. Government removes impediment that ruined person's life
5. Case goes to court
6. Government argues that the case is moot because the impediment has been removed and the plaintiff no longer has a case or even standing
7. Government hopes to get away with it

It's good that the Supremes saw past this charade this time, but how many times in the past has it worked?

9 posted on 03/25/2024 11:06:00 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (What is left around which to circle the wagons?action )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Apparently he attended a Trump rally.


10 posted on 03/25/2024 11:06:04 AM PDT by gitmo (If your biography doesn't match your theology, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

... and pressured him to become an informant.
******************************
I wonder if any of those minority genius women (/sarc and LOL) on the SC will factor that piece of information into their opinions on the case about the Fed’l Gov’t alleged right to tell any of the press/media which articles/stories to suppress.
Maybe the good brother Clarence Thomas will be able to explain it to the other minorities on the Court.
sigh ... I know.Hope is not a strategy.


11 posted on 03/25/2024 11:09:45 AM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

The decision itself here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1178_p8k0.pdf


14 posted on 03/25/2024 1:08:15 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson