Posted on 03/28/2024 9:43:52 AM PDT by hardspunned
Covert allies? What is the relationship between ISIS-K* and the US?
Recent data reveals that the perpetrators of the heinous massacre on Crocus City Hall were allegedly recruited via a Telegram channel administered by members of 'Wilayat Khorasan'*, also recognized as ISIS-K*, per a Sputnik source. As we delve deeper into the motive behind this branch of ISIS*, Sputnik has put together essential facts and clues linking the US to these notorious jihadists.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Is IsisK located in Battle Creek Michigan? Just a long shot.
In Syria the US-UK launched the Civil War with the jihadist Bin Laden followers (Al-Qaeda lovers) in 2011.
Then Hezbollah, the Iranians and Russians helped prop up the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
Next the new high-octane jihadists called ISIS appeared on the scene to wreak hell and havoc on Assad, his allies and the people of northern Iraq.
The Russians are trying to blame the US and NATO for this attack since Lukashenko pretty much spoiled their attempt to blame Ukraine.
Both gambits were desperate attempts to cover up either FSB complicity in the attack or absolute utter incompetence by not even having a single armed guard present at the concert with a warning about terrorism having been received.
“Is IsisK located in Battle Creek Michigan? Just a long shot.”
Shhh. Don’t tell the Russians about our sooper secret spy unit called “Special K”.
That’s one crispy band of operators!
“..Is IsisK located in Battle Creek Michigan? Just a long shot...”
Perhaps...or maybe even in DC!!
Odongo’s boys, maybe??
He visited the UK just before all this happened
NOTHING would be surprising in this day and time.
I thot their headquarters was located in Langley Virginia?
'nuff said about this absurdity.
Sputnik - nuff said.
Everyone should keep in mind that John McCain was indeed photographed with Isis.
ISIS-K immediately makes me think of “Covid-Delta.”
The first variant worked so well for political propaganda and social-engineering purposes, there’s plenty of tread left on that tire, so let’s now create an equally scary variant.
What photo is of McCain with ISIS?
ISIS is a bastard child of Obama's policies. They were bombed into irrelevance by Trump but, like the Taliban in Afghanistan, have reemerged during Obama's current crypto third term.
What photo is of McCain and Isis?
Gee I dunno.
It was a publicity photo of his meeting with the “rebels” in Syria.
And guess who was there?
US and British connections to ISIS have been covered by many people. US and British analysts like Mike Benz, and former intelligence people like Alistair Crooke and Ray McGovern have outlined the connections
Dismiss Russian sources if you wish, but they are not the only ones. Of course US mainstream media will never, ever talk about it.
The MSM STILL tell us that Trump had Russian prostitutes pee on Obama’s hotel bed, or that he had a secret Russian server in Trump towers.
From what all I have read (mostly on FR) over the past few years is that ISIS-K’s brand of Islam is not the same as Iran and Syria. Russia supports Iran and Syria therefore an enemy of ISIS-K.
The US and NATO are also enemies with Iran, Syria`and Russia.
- a common enemy.
Therefore our clandestine services may have funded and used ISIS-K in their war against the common enemy - so some say.
“In Syria the US-UK launched the Civil War with the jihadist Bin Laden followers”
Not true. ISIS was not in the mix in Syria in the start of the civil rest agains Asad. Those who rose up the opposition to Assad were not followers of Bin Laden. They were a mixture of many different groups none of which had connections to Al Queda or Bin Laden, while some had histories associated with the Syrian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.
ISIS entered Syria from Iraq after the civil war in Syria made parts of Syria out of the control of Assad and nearly “no mans lands”.
Too many people take consequences and conflate them to be intentions, which they often are not.
The U.S. never intended to grow Jihadists in Afghanistan when it helped fund militants opposition to the Soviet occupation. By American stupidity it allowed the Saudis and the Pakistani intelligence to deliver the local forces (of their choosing) and the U.S. supplied its military and technical expertise. The consequences - Bin Laden growing in Afghanistan - was not a U.S. intention, but a U.S. blunder. The U.S. repeated the same blunder in Syria, and again, as in Afghanistan, and turn around - quit supporting the “Syrian opposition”, which it did, and then go after ISIS, which it did. (Just as it had previously had to go into Afghanistan against the Jihadists the Pakistani intelligence helped lift up - the Taliban.
U.S. blunders more than U.S. intentions.
0bie’s Brigade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.