Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JK Rowling hate law posts NOT criminal, police say
BBC ^ | April 2 | BBC

Posted on 04/02/2024 10:30:27 AM PDT by RandFan

Social media comments made by JK Rowling challenging Scotland's new hate crime law are not being treated as criminal, Police Scotland has said.

The Harry Potter author described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

The new law creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to protected characteristics.

The force said complaints had been received but no action would be taken.

Reacting to the news, Ms Rowling posted on X: "I hope every woman in Scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance of biological sex will be reassured by this announcement, and I trust that all women - irrespective of profile or financial means - will be treated equally under the law.

"If they go after any woman for simply calling a man a man, I'll repeat that woman's words and they can charge us both at once."

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, which came into effect on Monday, makes it a criminal offence to make derogatory comments based on disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: biologicalsex; freespeech; hatecrime; jkrowling; police; publicorder; scotland; trans

1 posted on 04/02/2024 10:30:27 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Is that some sort of Scottish “freedom of speech” and freedom of expression thing? Won’t catch on the US.

After 2024 if we lose there will be no such freedom including quoting the Bible (hate speech) or openly displaying the American flag (nazi symbolism).


2 posted on 04/02/2024 10:34:16 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
protected characteristics
3 posted on 04/02/2024 10:35:24 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I’ll repeat that woman’s words and they can charge us both at once.”

~~~

Bold!

She knows they wont make a crime out of her words because they don’t want to martyr her, so to speak.

So now she is doubling down and suggesting that if any woman is being charged criminally, she will do the same, in order to challenge their double standards


4 posted on 04/02/2024 10:41:53 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

JK Rowling faced them down. Good for her.


5 posted on 04/02/2024 10:42:24 AM PDT by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

JK Rowling did not commit suicide... yet.


6 posted on 04/02/2024 10:49:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

For now...based on a subjective opinion.

Tomorrow...the goalposts move.


7 posted on 04/02/2024 10:49:53 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

She has the money to fight the bastards. She has enough money to get the law tossed so they don’t dare try it. The average person would get crushed by the system.


8 posted on 04/02/2024 10:50:06 AM PDT by gibsonguy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

"THEY MAY TAKE OUR LIVES, BUT THEY'LL NEVER TAKE -- oh, it's gone."

9 posted on 04/02/2024 10:52:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

If enough people would refuse to submit to this ****, we’d have a lot less of it.


10 posted on 04/02/2024 10:56:20 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

I’m glad our forefathers didn’t feel that way.


11 posted on 04/02/2024 10:56:56 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

Police Scotland are numpty bastards who were probably told nae ta have a go at ‘er


12 posted on 04/02/2024 10:57:37 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
That's a liberal's favorite law: one open to interpretation.

Liberals like to let DA's decide under what circumstance and which individuals have committed a crime.

Also called selective enforcement.

13 posted on 04/02/2024 10:58:42 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

NOT criminal,...until it is.


14 posted on 04/02/2024 10:58:51 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (Make orwell fiction again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“The Harry Potter author [accurately] described several transgender women as men.. . .” She only stated the truth.

Ms. Rowling writes fantasy but does not live gender fantasy.

She also has FU money, so the authorities may be a little more careful with her.


15 posted on 04/02/2024 11:06:29 AM PDT by csn vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This hate law crap is just a sneaky way of making the opinion of anyone who disagrees with you illegal.


16 posted on 04/02/2024 11:10:40 AM PDT by TalBlack (I We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova
JK Rowling faced them down. Good for her.

Rowling has FU money. They didn’t want to pick this fight with her. They’ll go after poor schmucks who can’t afford to hire the best lawyers.

17 posted on 04/02/2024 11:12:34 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“The new law creates a new crime of “stirring up hatred” “

That new law itself stirs up hatred!


18 posted on 04/02/2024 11:16:47 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Too bad Arlen Specter died. Now we’ll never know, he was the expert in Scottish law.


19 posted on 04/02/2024 11:39:11 AM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Only for her. It applies to all others though.


20 posted on 04/02/2024 12:55:37 PM PDT by DownInFlames (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson