Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GulliverSwift; Liz

What Liz posted bears repeating-and re-reading:

The USSC itself ruled via Dobbs
the rqConstitution doesn’t give rights to the federal govt to intervene in the decision;
that’s already been left to the states.

Do you realize that it took the pro-life movement over 40 long years of protest and lobbying to get the US Supreme Court to reverse Roe v Wade, which they finally did-and rightfully made it a States Rights Issue-because the fed has no business in deciding that life or death issue any more than they have a right to decide whether every state will have/not have the death penalty, or for what. I live in a pro life state and I’m pro life, as is the majority here.

If a woman is determined to kill her unborn baby, she can drive across the state line to New Mexico, where there are plenty of drive-thru type abortion facilities. She just can’t do it in Texas. Do not be foolish and bring this issue to the fed-AGAIN-do you want abortion on demand up to birth again? That is we had before with Roe as the status quo. Many of us do NOT want that back, or anything like it-if you don’t want abortion in your own state, work to get it stopped like other states have done-why would you ever, ever trust the fed with any life and death issue?


93 posted on 04/08/2024 1:14:00 PM PDT by Texan5 (`"You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

Nice wrap.


100 posted on 04/08/2024 1:17:04 PM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson