Pfizer Says ‘Sorry’ for Illegally Promoting Unlicensed COVID Vax with No Safety Data.

The National Pulse ^ | 04/08/2024 | JACK MONTGOMERY

[Responsibility2nd]

Big Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has “deeply” apologized for promoting an “unlicensed” coronavirus vaccine, after being rebuked for the fifth time by state regulators. The move earned the firm another reprimand from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) in the United Kingdom.

The British government regulator found Pfizer had “proactively disseminated” an “unlicensed medicine” on Twitter, now X, in November 2020 while providing no information on its safety or adverse side effects.

 

Berkeley Phillips, medical director of Pfizer UK, shared a message from a Pfizer employee in the U.S. promoting their “vaccine candidate” as “95 percent effective in preventing Covid-19, and 94 percent effective in people over 65 years old.”

Four other Pfizer employees, one described as “senior,” also shared the message. In addition to taking issue with the lack of information on safety and side effects, the PMCPA said the information on the vaccine’s usefulness was “limited.”

Pfizer said it “fully recognizes and accepts the issues highlighted by this PMCPA ruling” and is “deeply sorry.”

Despite formally taking responsibility for the debacle, a Pifizer spokesman attempted to shift the lion’s share of the blame to individual employees.

“Pfizer UK has a comprehensive policy on personal use of social media in relation to Pfizer’s business which prohibits colleagues from interacting with any social media related to Pfizer’s medicines and vaccines — backed by staff briefings and training,” the spokesman said.

“The personal use of social media by UK pharmaceutical industry employees in relation to company business is a challenging area for pharmaceutical companies,” they added.

[Responsibility2nd]

[Jyotishi]

I used the following URL to read the original:

https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/04/08/pfizer-says-sorry-for-illegally-promoting-unlicensed-covid-vax-with-no-safety-data/

[Tacrolimus1mg]

Thanks. I was dreading searching for it.

[HandBasketHell]

When unsuccessfully attempting to talk my extended family out of taking the jibby jabs, I asked them: "When you see a commercial for any drug on tv, nearly half the air time is taken up warning you about serious side effects. Aren't you the least bit concerned that the ads they're running are telling you it's 'safe and effective?' Can you name me one other drug on the market that has tv commercials like that? How can they possibly know it's safe when it takes other drugs years and years of testing to even get on the market?"

They weren't concerned. And I was the one who was "the problem." I was the one "putting them at risk" because I refused to comply.

[Jyotishi]

“Thanks. I was dreading searching for it.”

You are welcome. I think that all who visit FR are already on various lists.

[Uncle Miltie]

“95 percent effective in preventing Covid-19”

That’s a flat lie.

[chickenlips]

I’m seriously starting to think that the jabs weren’t “three vaccines all are very, very good,” “beautiful vaccines”, ”one of the greatest achievements of mankind”.

[Jane Long]

I can completely relate :-(

[Responsibility2nd]

I see what you did there.

[drSteve78]

Preached at by Science Experts that lied to him, and us, US, every single day.

[Aria]

Show me the money. Sorry doesn’t cut it.

[NWFree]

They don’t have to apologize to me - I knew better than to take the fake elixir

[zipper]

Or if you’re in the military this is how you’re treated for being a refusenik of the experimental “vaccine”. Scroll down for the video:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1777060223238250664.html

[Retain Mike]

In Vietnam when the unit got “friendly fire” the standard response from the fire base was “sorry about that”.

[Retain Mike]

No problem here. I just continue to naively irritate them.

[metmom]

*Sorry* doesn’t even begin to make amends for what they’ve done to us.

Burning in hell is a start.

[Sequoyah101]

I really don't give a flying fluck about money. What I want is revenge. An eye for an eye and a hell of a lot of suffering.

Sorry?

[citizen]

Has Dugway and the gas dr shown up yet to assure us all is well?

[Dimples]

Well consider this (how to lie with statistics): Odds of NOT contracting Covid19 based on the ORIGINAL Pfizer Clinical Trial of 43,488 volunteers (roughly 21,744 vaccinated, 21,744 placebo): 99.4% - only 170 of 41,000 contracted Covid.

Odds of getting Covid19 AT ALL (vaxed or not): 0.6%'

Odds of being protected from Covid by just going about your normal life (placebo group only: 99.21%

Where does the 95% come from? Well there were 8 cases in the vax group and 162 in the placebo group from between 7 days and 6 months. Odds of catching Covid in each group: 8/21744 = 0.037% (vax group); 162/21,744 = 0.745% (placebo group).

Effeciveness: 0.745 / (0.037 + 0,745) = 95%

While there was a measureable difference between vax and placebo, your odds of getting Covid at all were so small (0.6%) that the 95% "improvement" from that vax could NEVER outweigh the possible and unknown side effects from the vax so early in the trials.

And of course NOW we know that the vax is implicated as a contributor or outright cause of untold millions of severe side effects (including death).

Hmmm 95% effective ... for a disease you were already 99.55 unlikely to get????

[ronnie raygun]

So the licensed they are still standing behind