Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem

He’s saying that IF the 1913 rates AND brackets, applied, but adjusting for inflation, that someone making 750 K would pay 2.5K in taxes. Not complicated.


17 posted on 04/15/2024 10:02:40 AM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Flash Bazbeaux
“He's saying that IF the 1913 rates AND brackets, applied, but adjusting for inflation, that someone making 750 K would pay 2.5K in taxes. Not complicated.”

OK, but I think the author could have illustrated his point better; and his point was the 16th amendment “. . . was a simple little thing, with rather large consequences for the republic.”

By my math using the tax computations worksheet someone in 2023 having a taxable income of $750,000 would pay over $209,000 of federal income taxes - - not $2,500. Set aside FICA taxes up to 15.3 percent (yes, I know I'm supposed to pretend the employer pays half.)

If the author wanted to reveal the “large consequences” of the 16th, he missed by quite a lot. Today we can thank the 16th for the upper rate of 37 percent.

38 posted on 04/15/2024 1:28:05 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson