Before the internet, conservative journalism thrived and wasn’t making stuff up. Human Events. National Review. American Spectator. University Bookman. Intercollegiate Review.
All of those sources you mention, every source gets things wrong. Every single source has to be checked. You don't understand that???
You think I blindly cite information from GP without checking their "facts"? I do that for every source?
Apparently, you don't know how to do that?
Reputable sources can get things wrong.
Unreputable sources do that on purpose. It’s called “making things up”.
I’m curious to learn what tool you’re using to know when GP is trying to get things right and when they are just making stuff up.
Is it a decoder ring from a Cracker Jacks box? A Magic 8 Ball? This could be a very useful tool for the rest of us. Maybe Amazon sells one.