Posted on 04/22/2024 7:17:25 AM PDT by lowbridge
Isn't that rich. Didn't the January 6 committee withhold, suppress, and destroy evidence?
Liz Cheney. That’s where I stopped reading.
That statement is correct. However, it has nothing to do with what happened on January 6th.
Go catch some flies Lizard.
It’s afraid....
Reminded me to take out the trash
The dems seem to think that the American public lives and breathes “JAN. 6TH!!!” every day of their lives. No one is voting based on Jan 6, in my opinion.
Liz trying to get her name in the press again. I think she realizes that her 15 minutes of fame are almost up. Ironically, she should be praying that Trump gets elected. That’s the only thing that will keep her grift going.
And DJT was still president on J6
But if that had been the case for PDJT he ought to have been convicted in the impeachment trial. He wasn't!
Hey Liz, didn’t the voters kick you out of Wyoming by their vote? Take comfort that it was just a vote and not torches and pitchforks.
No Immunity for Trump means no Immunity for all politicians and any damage they do they should be sued
No wonder she GOT VOTED OUT !!!
“of the justices agree that a former president who attempted to seize power and remain in office illegally”
Would like to hear the NYT explain exactly how Trump tried to do that.
Such nonsense.
She should be very careful here. I’d hate to see Dick Cheney arrested and put on trial for Iraq.
The skunk should be locked up. RINOs are a danger to the republic.
She’s right. They should swiftly reiterate the importance of Presidential immunity, stop the show trials. And then imprison those like Cheney who dishonestly attempted to prosecute non-crimes for political gains.
Exactly....Im not sure any Justices think such a thing happened to be honest. They would need to stick to the facts. Trump words, actions certainly do not lend credence to the conspiracy. Just last week NG and Capitol police basically corroborated Trump claims of security being turned down because of “optics.” and video shows us all where the violence started.... with the police. Trump is constitutionally allowed to dispute an election , especially one that contained so many anomalies and alternate electors certainly weren’t invented by Trump... its part of the process.
“the public may never hear critical and historic evidence developed”
Isn’t that rich. Didn’t the January 6 committee withhold, suppress, and destroy evidence?
Yes, they did. They did it with eyes open. The had people testify that they knew were lying, and whistleblowers suppressed that stated they had proof. Basically, the Jan. 6th committee destroyed and suppressed evidence for political purposes, and denied the public access to the work product. They violated the laws. The Jan. 6th committee members are not above the law, but nothing has been done to them because they did the ‘uniparty’ attack on Trump. Trump isn’t above the law, he is below the law. The future will not look kindly on the acts of the Jan 6th committee, nor the acts of the current executive, done for political purposes.
Hard to believe we used to be a Constitutional Republic, what is occurring now is so Hitler and Stalinist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.