Replies

I am reading an article from the AP published February 22, 2021, in which it is reported that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Cavanaugh were willing to examine the issue of late-appearing votes in the critical swing state PA. The first three justices wanted to take the case even though the election had been certified, BECAUSE, they wanted to provide "guidance" on the issue of delayed vote counting, mail-in ballots and the fraud known to be associated with it, and other voter fraud issues.

Cavanaugh refused inexplicably to take it (he would have been the required fourth justice needed to force the Court to take the case so his refusal was decisive... but he did not).

What should he do? He should take cases like that, and not succumb to the intimidation of the compromised Chief Justice who essentially ordered Barrett (and maybe Cavanaugh and others) not to take up the whole issue of election fraud.

The justices, for reasons unknown but may be related to intimidation from the Chief Justice, have fecklessly sidestepped dealing with the widespread fraud associated with the 2020 election: They don't speak of it or refer to it in any arguments or decisions. It is a nonissue in ANY of their op-eds or magazine articles or rubber-chicken-dinner speeches.

That failure on their part to shed light on and lend credibility to the real existence of election stealing, as investigators like D'Souza and others have proved, may prove crucial. It is something you two and I will sadly contemplate if and when we see the same widespread fraud perpetrated (unopposed) in the 2024 election...and if it leads to Joe Biden being reelected for another four years.

Remember, when that happens, that it could have been prevented, had the Supreme Court made the issue of voter fraud front and center when it had the opportunity to do so.

Because it did not, the left, especially the press, made the bold move of cancelling anyone and everyone who even brought up the possibility of fraud. They made the voting fraud issue disappear, with this critical help of the SCOTUS, and particularly Cavanaugh.

Although the procedures the Supreme Court does are limited, each justice is a legal celebrity who can attach his personality and intellect to one or more issues to great advantage. Cavanaugh and Barrett can take advantage as relative newcomers and should focus on this issue.

It is so fundamental: If voting fraud occurs enough to throw elections, then all the legislators and judiciary are potentially fraudulent. Then all the laws are fraudulent, and all the procedures of our courts (think about the Soros and Zuckerberg DAs around the country and what they are doing to our republic now!) are fraudulent. All our judges are fraudulent. Everything in the law is a fraud.

We would then be left with nothing but vigilantism, and jury nullification, as means of maintaining any kind of law and order.

Notice I didn't even mention the executives like Biden elected by fraud: He and maybe others have the power to start world wars, bankrupt our economy, tax us into slavery, imprison us, and maybe kill us.

Election fraud is a big deal. It may be the biggest deal of all.