I'm sure Claude would give "your brother" top marks for his legal acumen...
You expect anything different from Turley? Trump could shoot someone on 5th Ave in cold blood and he’d come up with some sort of scenario that Trump was being picked on.
Good day.
I'm sure Claude would give "your brother" top marks for his legal acumen...
>> The judge admonished the defense counsel for their lack of objection in response to their request for mistrial.
You choose your words like the Trump-hating progressive that you are.
No, Wetback Cur did not “admonish” them for their lack of objection.
He “deflected” THEIR admonishment of HIM with that lame excuse, after ADMITTING that the witness gave inappropriate testimony and long after DENYING defense’s request that he not seat the witness, after defense predicted exactly how it WOULD unfold.
Wetback Cur will be brutally curbstomped upon appeal for this and many other failings, but let’s pray it doesn’t get that far. Oh nevermind, you’re not one of us, joesucks, you’re an American hating progressive.
Vile. You need to ride the zot lightning.
God I love seeing you repeatedly suspended, only to eventually get totally zotted.
“I See Dead People”: Bragg’s Case Against Trump Goes Paranormal
JonathanTurley.Org ^ | May 13, 2024 | Jonathan Turley
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4237578/posts
...The Daniels testimony will live in infamy in the annals of criminal justice. For two days, she offered lurid and completely irrelevant details whose only possible purpose was to humiliate Trump. Admitting that she was coached by the prosecution in her testimony, it was clear that she was there not to win a case but to win an election. Judge Juan Merchan allowed this legal burlesque to unfold in his courtroom, later blaming defense counsel who had vociferously objected to her appearance and the scope of the examination.
The cross examination was devastating. It shattered her laughable claim that she had not really been seeking money in shaking Trump down for a non-disclosure agreement, a claim contradicted by her own former lawyer. Daniels also revealed that she had spoken with the dead, and that a ghost had once held her boyfriend under water in a bathtub. She also said that she lived in a haunted house, only to discover later that the spirit haunting it was actually a large possum...
...That is when Merchan will face a key test of judicial ethics. He has failed to protect the rights of the defendant from a baseless, politically motivated prosecution. He could insist that he simply felt Bragg had a right to present his case. He will soon be done and, as expected, it is entirely based on Cohen, a disbarred perjurer who will ask for his former client to be sent to prison for following his own legal advice...
I'm sure that "your brother" feels differently.