Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
Upon awakening this morning, I was wonder about something that puzzles me still: isn't it strange that our planet went through a period of gigantic landbaseed life forms, then such a stage ended and the largest animals today are in the oceans? The gigantism wasn't limited to just the animal kingdom either; many plant species fossils attest to the outsized proportions of many plants at the same time dinos ruled the earth. What would allow for such gigantic growth? Would a twin planet in close proximity, that created a tidal force such as the Moon produces, but on a larger scale, account for such a growth period? The physics of such giants would seem to have a simple explanation for becoming no longer the norm! I don't know the science of this, so I'm raising this perhaps silly question here on a Velikofskyesque thread.
17 posted on 11/07/2001 10:26:17 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Nothing quite so esoteric. The oxygen levels during the Carbiniferous Age were a tad bit higher than today, allowing large insects to exist. Gigantic land animals existed pert near up to 15k years ago (the dinosaurs were not nature's only experiment with big beasties -- some land mammals rivaled some of the sauropods in size) when there was a massive die-off of most terrestrial megafauna (anything over 45kg). The animal kingdom hasn't quite recovered from that die off just yet.
20 posted on 11/07/2001 10:48:36 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
"gigantic landbaseed life forms"

Isn't that mentioned in Frank Herbert's Dune?

Sorry.

--Boris

25 posted on 11/07/2001 4:30:01 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson