Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Molnar believed that Roman astrologers would have interpreted such an event as signifying the birth of a divine king in Judea.

This statement is kind of silly. I mean, a bunch of guys in Rome who don't really think that Judea is any more or less important than any other conquered land see an obscure atrological event and think "Oh, this must mean the birth of a kind in Judea". Hardly.

9 posted on 12/21/2001 5:50:15 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King
I mean, a bunch of guys in Rome who don't really think that Judea is any more or less important than any other conquered land see an obscure atrological event and think "Oh, this must mean the birth of a kind in Judea". Hardly.

That's not quite correct. The ancient astrologers had divided the sky into different regions -- each symbolizing a particualr nation or race. It's all very complicated. And, I can't remember all the details. But, suffice to say I too had the same objection you raised until I learned a bit more about Astrology at the time of the Romans.

18 posted on 12/21/2001 6:51:43 AM PST by backup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson