Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese steelmaker pays for US tariffs (Bush was right, I was wrong)
BBC ^ | 4/29/02 | staff

Posted on 04/29/2002 9:15:49 AM PDT by LarryLied

China's biggest steelmaker has seen its profits plummet as it faces what observers believe will be a flood of foreign steel into its domestic market.

Now that the US has slapped tariffs on steel imports in an attempt to protect its own industry, exporting countries are thought likely to look to China's huge and booming economy as an alternative market.

Baoshan Iron & Steel's admission that net profits for the first three months of the year were 39.5% lower than last year therefore comes at a bad time.

The company, the fourth biggest in the world by market capitalisation, said it made a profit of 547.8m yuan ($66.3m; £45.4m) for the three months, on sales which fell 2.3% to 7.09bn yuan.

Flooding in

The losses at Baosteel, as it is known, follow a 14.4% fall in profits for 2001 as a whole from the previous year.

"In the first quarter of 2002, the domestic and international steel markets were sluggish and the prices of our core products such as cold-rolled and hot-rolled steel plates fell 11% year on year," it said in a statement.

Imports have surged since the US introduced selective tariffs of up to 30%. China's newly-minted membership of the World Trade Organisation and the lower tariffs it brings with it is also encouraging other countries to get in on the act.

Baosteel is now asking for government protection.

Help is on the way, in the shape of anti-dumping investigations launched against cold-rolled steel imports from South Korea, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinastuff; chinese; freetrade; steel; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: jlogajan
power of the government to raise the price of my goods to give welfare to corporations.

Well they need it see? They are protecting their interests and in the long run going to be hurting the sales of every product theirs is tied to. But Bush did a good thing, supposedly. A tariff war doesn't have winners, just a bunch of broke citizens, rich corporations, and the lawmakers have fat pockets from voting the way they were paid to vote

41 posted on 04/29/2002 11:15:39 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: *"FREE" Trade;*China stuff
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
42 posted on 04/29/2002 11:19:26 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
You protectionists are all socialist under the skin.

Bingo.

43 posted on 04/29/2002 11:21:57 AM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
BUMP
44 posted on 04/29/2002 11:22:39 AM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I'll grant you that you were right. But your reasons were wrong :-)

I would be flattered if you even remembered my reasons.

45 posted on 04/29/2002 11:24:34 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
they were quoting a Chinese company who says that imports into China are REDUCING prices. Meanwhile back at the US...
...We have to pay higher prices for steel using goods than we would have had to pay otherwise. Thanks Bush, for using the power of the government to raise the price of my goods...

Actually, lower steel prices in China not only forces antiquated, inefficient, pollution-belching Chinese steel-mills to shut down, it also makes your crapola, imported Huffy bicycles even cheaper at Wal-Mart. You have nothing to complain about!

46 posted on 04/29/2002 11:25:42 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Very true, they aren't stamping out toasters and cd racks using American steel that's for sure.
47 posted on 04/29/2002 11:33:18 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush; miss marple; howlin; liz
Thanks for reposting these words of clarity and sanity.

I could remember that you had posted the best answers to the harshness on both sides when this issue was first debated on Free Republic and certain so called conservative talk show hosts took their long knives out.

It looks like you were right on target.

Our gasoline refineries are in the same condition. I don't think that a new gasoline refinery has been built for at least two decades. The current ones are held together with baling wire, duct tape, super glue and some incredible maintence work by creative and resourceful construction companies. The enviralists have prevented us from building any new refineries.

When you throw out the vile rhetoric from certain sides, the wisdom and knowledge that our Freepers share with us is awesome. Thanks to you for sharing this wisdom and insight when this first came up and for reposting it.

In a time of war, you can't be dependent on foriegn anything and in particuliar steel.

48 posted on 04/29/2002 11:35:46 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
You know you have a point...
49 posted on 04/29/2002 11:36:18 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Rush is so busy flapping his mouth that he has no time to think about the views of those more intelligent than he!
50 posted on 04/29/2002 11:44:06 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Screw free trade. I favored GW Bush when he put tarrifs on foreign steel.
51 posted on 04/29/2002 11:50:03 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I love Rush.
52 posted on 04/29/2002 12:55:15 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Bump( when I get out of College and actually have income I think I'll change my name to Capitalist Pig).
53 posted on 04/29/2002 12:56:59 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
It wasn't only free trade, it was about us making sure we have a dependable AMERICAN source of steel for our war effort.

Repeat that until people understand.

54 posted on 04/29/2002 12:59:29 PM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I stand vindicated once again on the whole free trade nonsense! Thank goodness Bush and his advisors are a bit more realistic than the ideologues who have co opted the right with their free trade mythos. Free Trade is a scam.
55 posted on 04/29/2002 1:01:24 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Strategery rules!

As a student of language, I love that word. I guarantee you that it will become a documented, legitimate word.

56 posted on 04/29/2002 1:04:34 PM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
You protectionists are all socialist under the skin.

Statements like that squelch debate. This because of this. And it makes just about as much sense, too.

Surely you know better. I despise tariffs. But it now appears to have been a method behind the madness.

I'll admit when I'm wrong. Will you?

57 posted on 04/29/2002 1:08:26 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
This angle never occurred to me when I (and others) attacked the tariffs. While I still believe free trade is best, this does have short term advantages. Sure is shaking up China and aiding our allies in our war on terror. Any fellow free traders care to explain how this isn't in our best interests?

Our consumers still have to pay an inflated price. How is that ever in our best interest?

58 posted on 04/29/2002 1:09:20 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan;larrylied
Oh yes, artificially high prices for everything is really really good. How could we free traders been so stoopid?

Larry appears to be a rather naive dupe. His grasp of economics isn't all that solid. I guess he's what you might say has one of those 'soccer dads'mentality.

59 posted on 04/29/2002 1:11:04 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
It wasn't only free trade, it was about us making sure we have a dependable AMERICAN source of steel for our war effort.

What ignorant stone-aged thinking. How many battleships have we built since the war started? This tariff is a tax on society to pay for retiree benefits in the steel industry. Don't be so easily fooled. Its embarassing.

60 posted on 04/29/2002 1:13:09 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson