Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
What are the other reasons Dusek would not call Faulkner, the guy who was at the autopsy?..(

My guess is that there was nothing he could say that would be beneficial to the prosecution.

He had no cause of death, no evidence of DW's DNA or other bodily fluids in/on Danielle. Not much he could do for Dusek.

42 posted on 07/09/2002 10:13:44 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
Faulkners the bug guy....so other than affirming the defenses position of body placement after DW under surveilence....what other reason could there be that I'm not seeing?
51 posted on 07/09/2002 10:21:50 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
My guess is that there was nothing he could say that would be beneficial to the prosecution.

Pretty much sums up ALL of the witnesses for the prosecution, don't'cha think? ;)

108 posted on 07/09/2002 11:07:49 PM PDT by Dasaji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson