Replies

You have him convicted and sentenced

See, I don't see how you can make that statement. I certainly do not.

I can say the evidence is very strong, and I could even say that at this point I'd vote for a conviction, but the case isn't over.

I most certainly don't know how I'd vote on sentencing. I guess you think I'd vote for the Death Penalty. I think probably not, and I believe such a penalty requires a unanimous verdict.

I think the fact that the Prosecution is asking for the death penalty may be one thing that really kills their case.

I am absolutely pro capitol punishment. I would be in 100% agreement of the death penalty for Westerfield IF and ONLY IF there was not so much as a twinge of doubt in my mind. From what I have seen, there is nothing that has convinced me without a doubt or even close.

That may be the rub here. Some jurors may think he is most likely the perp but have little pieces that don't add up.

The Prosecution may have faired better if the investigation had been broader and given the appearance of an open minded search for the killer.

Since you stated that "at this point I'd vote for a conviction" that must mean that, during his case in chief, the prosecutor convinced you BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that David Westerfield is guilty of kidnapping and murdering Danielle. It also means that thus far the defense has not created any reasonable doubt to cause you to change that opinion.

Sometime yesterday I posted some questions that I personally would want answered before I could find David Westerfield guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution did not provide any answers, but since at this time you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Westerfield is guilty, maybe you can answer my questions. Please tell me:

1. When and how did David Westerfield kidnap Danielle?
2. When and how did David Westerfield murder Danielle?
3. When and how did David Westerfield dispose of Danielle's body?

I would certainly appreciate any help you could provide.