Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2002 4:00:28 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: gcruse; Carry_Okie
The Grand Canyon would have been in violation of EPA non-point-source regulations had the EPA existed eons ago.

My suggestion is that we should find which ancient deep-pockets republican corporation is responsible for all that sediment and force them to remediate: FILL IT IN! </sarcasm>

2 posted on 07/20/2002 4:05:37 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Interesting. I would like to see the estimates of area the reservoir encompassed. Must have been one huge lake if indeed it happened that way.

I think the Pleistocene flash flooding of Oregon and Washington State is a cool read, those ice dams at Lake Missoula must have been huge.


7 posted on 07/20/2002 4:21:03 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
This is easy to imagine. The cut looks like fresh erosion. After all the change of heart on what caused similar features on Mars, it is not surprising to find some of the martian theories being reflected right back to earth.
9 posted on 07/20/2002 4:28:34 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
"We don't have enough hard-core evidence to prove it one way or the other,"

They don't really know squat, except they are SURE it wasn't Noah's flood. Another example of our tax dollars at waste.

14 posted on 07/20/2002 7:55:44 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *crevo_list; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; BMCDA; jlogajan; jennyp
bump
21 posted on 07/20/2002 10:20:09 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
I'm missing something here. The source amount of water is the same -- it is just that in one case it comes by massively, but for a short period. In the other case it comes by less massively, but over a far longer period of time. Shouldn't the erosion be the same. Or rather, shouldn't massive waters cut wide and shallow, while reduced waters over longer times cut narrow and deep?
23 posted on 07/20/2002 11:35:10 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
new data indicating the canyon's Inner Gorge may be no more than 700,000 years old, much younger than earlier estimates of 3 million to 5 million years, said Robert Webb, a research geologist with USGS.

Damn!
I wonder how humans 700,00 years ago managed to mobilize and abuse the environment to that extent...
People are no damn good; a cancer on the planet.

They probly managed that while they were extinctioning the dinosaurs and producing massive clouds of greenhouse gases.
They all were homophobe and sexist and oh my gawd... probably smokers, the bunch of them.
Bah humbug.

I just might go extinction myself soon if this persists.
Shocking..

31 posted on 07/21/2002 9:12:26 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Uncivil engineers build damns.
41 posted on 07/23/2002 9:42:51 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
bump
44 posted on 07/23/2002 9:59:59 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Catastrophic floods built Grand Canyon

Catastrophic? The result of some ancient sequester?

54 posted on 03/02/2013 11:53:02 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson