Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carbon dioxide turned into hydrocarbon fuel
New Scientist ^ | July 31, 2002 | Eugenie Samuel

Posted on 08/02/2002 7:43:06 AM PDT by Paradox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Paradox
You need to put a manic midi on this thread with frequent jpegs of spinning plates on sticks.
21 posted on 08/02/2002 9:16:02 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
"all I want to know is whether this will make it possible for Arab oil producers to finally eat their sand."

'Fraid not. The reason why we buy oil from the Middle East is because it is cheaper there than anywhere else in the world. Coming up with yet another way to manufacture artificial oil won't change that. We can't change the laws of economics or thermodynamics; all we can change are the governments of the Middle East.

22 posted on 08/02/2002 9:39:34 AM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Bump for later reading.
23 posted on 08/02/2002 10:05:30 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Essay Of The Week

Quote of the Day by by Libloather

24 posted on 08/02/2002 10:49:24 AM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists; *Global Warming Hoax; *RealScience; *Energy_List; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Index Bump
25 posted on 08/02/2002 11:20:54 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Cool!
We can connect a CO2 -> Propane converter to AlGore's mouth and solve two problems at once.

Capt. Planet finally has a purpose!

26 posted on 08/02/2002 11:32:02 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monocle
Hydrogen chloride and the potential byproduct chlorine are both highly toxic and corrosive and could be factors limiting commercialization. Also, the cost of producing hydrogen chloride must be factored in.

Both HCl and chlorine are used industrially everyday throughout the world. Lots of materials that are potentially dangerous are used under safe conditions (f'rinstance, jewelers use cyanide as a cleaning agent, from what I understand of their craft). Don't know how much it costs, but my old high school stockpiled plenty of HCl tablets for use in lab.

The worries are marginal. Let's get some verification on this and tell the towel-heads to go pound sand up their %*$@&!!!! :-)

27 posted on 08/02/2002 11:32:09 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
We can connect a CO2 -> Propane converter to AlGore's mouth and solve two problems at once.

Or you could just harness the CO2 from his mouth and pump it back into his nose and definitely solve one problem.

28 posted on 08/02/2002 11:42:23 AM PDT by bloodmeridian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Doug Loss
"You really don't know anything about science, do you?"

Only sufficient for a Master's degree from M.I.T.

And you?

29 posted on 08/02/2002 12:39:36 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
natural methane deposits might have formed chemically with the metal in rocks acting as a catalyst

Nice renewable-resources find!

30 posted on 08/02/2002 12:42:30 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fabozz
"it'd be like running a power plant off HCl rather than hydrocarbons."

Yup. And what is the energy cost and/or dollar cost to make Hcl?...

I was recently asked to review a German patent(0055134A1). The engine was built and tested by BMW and it worked.

Basically the idea is you carry a big tank of water and feed aluminum wire into the tank, where it is reacted using a spark and the reaction Al + 3H2O --> Al2O3 + 3H2 allows free hydrogen to be burned in a modified engine with incoming air.

This is a “redox” reaction. Aluminum is being oxidized by the water, and the water is being “reduced” by the aluminum to make hydrogen.

In this reaction we have two moles of aluminum (54 grams) reacting with three moles of water (54 grams) to produce one mole of aluminum oxide (102 grams) plus 3 moles of hydrogen (six grams). So to make one pound of hydrogen, you will need to scale this by a factor of 75.6: 4.08 kilograms of aluminum (9 lb), 4.08 kilograms of water (again 9 lb), producing 7.71 kilograms of Al2O3 (17 lb) and one pound of hydrogen.

Aluminum costs about 70 cents per pound, so the aluminum cost will be $6.30 for each pound of hydrogen created.

The ‘heating value’ of gasoline is 114,000 BTU/gallon or +9,475 calories per gram. This is 4,297,765 calories per pound, or 17,055 BTU/lb.

Each pound of hydrogen is “worth” 60,190 BTU. So hydrogen liberates about 3.5 times as much energy per pound as gasoline. The problem is that gasoline costs about $1.60 per gallon at present, which is the same as $11.40 per cubic foot, or $0.239 per pound.

Since hydrogen gives 3.5 times as much energy per pound as gasoline, we need 1/3.5 times as many pounds of hydrogen to do the same job. This is 0.29 times. But the cost of making hydrogen from aluminum is $6.30 per pound of hydrogen. So 0.29 times $6.30 says hydrogen made from aluminum costs $1.80 per pound of gasoline equivalent. This is $1.80/$0.239=7.54 times as much on a per pound basis. Gas would have to rise to $12.06/gal before you “break even” using this system. In other words, the economics get you.

Part of the problem is that refined aluminum requires enormous amounts of electricity to make. From the raw ore to the high-purity aluminum takes huge amounts of energy. In fact, the price of aluminum and the price of electricity track one another and affect one another in a complex way. One can look at this patent as follows: the inventor has invented a very expensive battery which is “charged up” at the aluminum smelter plant. The “charging” is the energy cost of making pure aluminum out of rocks.

(Water has a “heat of formation” of –68,320 calories/mole. This is equivalent to –3795 calories per gram. Aluminum Oxide has a heat of formation of –1675.7 kJ/mole, or –3925.4 calories per gram. The total energy available from this reaction is thus (-3795)-(-3925.4) = +130.4 calories/gram. This energy is not used in the actual engine and all it does is make the water get hot.)

(Water weighs 62.4 lb/ft3. Nine pounds of water liberate one pound of hydrogen and 8 pounds of oxygen. In this system the oxygen is thrown away! It is sequestered in Al2O3. Then more oxygen from the air is used to burn the hydrogen.)

31 posted on 08/02/2002 12:56:24 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: boris
Oops. I meant 2Al+3H20 --> Al2O3+3H2
32 posted on 08/02/2002 1:47:17 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: boris
I don't know much about chemistry, but back in '72, my friend and I used to take one litre glass coke bottles and throw some water, aluminum foil and generic drain opener in the bottom. We'd fasten a baloon on the top and fill 'er up with hydrogen. Sometimes the bottle got so hot that it cracked.

Usually we'd get a bunch of these baloons and tie them together with a gasoline soaked string. Then we'd let them go at night and watch the cool explosions in the sky.

'Course, the main reason I hung around his house was that I liked his sister...
34 posted on 08/02/2002 1:54:26 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: boris
Can a catalytic reaction defy the 3rd law?
35 posted on 08/02/2002 6:33:04 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: boris
Can a catalytic reaction defy the 2nd law?
36 posted on 08/02/2002 6:33:58 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Actually, the experiement was not performed to show you could "recycle" CO2. The experiment was performed to show hydrocarbom formation might not require living plant and animal matter as an input. Hence "fossil fuel" might be a misnomer. "Mineral fuel" might be more accurate.
37 posted on 08/02/2002 8:16:07 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Exactly! That is why the oil companies keep continually finding these huge untapped reserves of oil. The earth manufactures the oil completely independent of any prior boimass existing on Earth. Of course, there are also a number of planets/moons within the solar system that have significant amounts of methane in their atmospheres. How many dinosaurs existed on those worlds to make that gas???? The traditional and misleading explanation for oil can't have it both ways - and it shows that they've been lying all along.
38 posted on 08/02/2002 11:51:06 PM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
"Can a catalytic reaction defy the 2nd law?"

No.

39 posted on 08/03/2002 2:38:36 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: boris
"You really don't know anything about science, do you?"
Only sufficient for a Master's degree from M.I.T.
LOL^3
I'll bet they made you take some arithmatic, too!
40 posted on 08/06/2002 1:22:44 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson