[Dog Gone]

I think this is very intriguing, but I have a hard time imagining that something 2,100 feet below sea level was dry land only 6,000 years ago.

The sea levels haven't changed that much during this period, and I don't know of a theory that could account for such a rapid decline in elevation. Certainly not one that could leave structures intact.

[chemainus]

now you're thinking doggone !! keep going...while everyone else swoons of Cayce and other lala land dreamscapes...

[mad_as_he$$]

I can take you to a spot in Nevada where there are sea creature fossil at 8,500 feet elevation. So I don’t believe that 2,100 feet below sea level is impossible. I do want more evidence of this find though.