[Redcloak]

Does this have something to do with the introduction of Neolithic Indo-Euorpean cheeses to the Indian Sub-continent?

[bala]

It has nothing to do with that (Probably I didn't post it properly or you didn't read the article completely). I'm saying that the current localized fossil tracking methods are not efficient enough to predict the existence of an ancient civilization. Even if the bridge is 17.5 lakhs years old, there is no way by which it could be denied as was done by some scrap astrophysist (Published in Times of India). He was trying to speculate on the issue based on archeological findings linked with fossil studies saying that there was no human civilization 17 lakhs years back. Firstly, I'm suggesting that fossil theories cannot explain a possible human civilization more than 17 lakh years back which means modern man could have very well existed even at this period. Secondly, to know the exact details about the age of the bridge, a careful study of the shoal layers and coral reefs should be done with the help of government organizations.

[TomServo]

Does this have something to do with the introduction of Neolithic Indo-Euorpean cheeses to the Indian Sub-continent?

I think it has something to do with the introduction of Neolithic Indo-Euorpean moose to the Indian Sub-continent.

[Junior]

Most likely it deals with the migration of prehistoric moose...

[WorkingClassFilth]

I concur. I would hasten to add that subductive processes in relation to clastic deposits of coagulated dairy protiens are often the mechanism behind such stratified formations as 'Port Wine Cheesespread, and other lesser known holiday food phenomena.