Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priest faces removal from Arlington diocese
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | Nov 13, 2002 | By George Archibald

Posted on 11/13/2002 6:03:55 AM PST by robowombat

Priest faces removal from Arlington diocese By George Archibald THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Roman Catholic bishop of Arlington has told a local priest that he will be permanently suspended from the diocese for obeying a subpoena to testify in a civil lawsuit about another priest's adultery with a parishioner's wife. Bishop Paul S. Loverde informed the Rev. James R. Haley in an Oct. 28 formal notice that he is being removed for violating a gag order a year ago, which barred him from disclosing wrongdoing by priests in order "to avoid scandal, to maintain ecclesiastical discipline and to protect the reputation and privacy of both the faithful and priests of this diocese."

The action prompted a national Catholic watchdog group to call for a local investigation of the bishop for intimidation of a witness in a civil proceeding. At the opening session Monday of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' meeting in the District, Bishop Loverde voted in favor of a requirement that bishops and priests police each other on issues involving improper sexual activity.

Nonetheless, the bishop said Father Haley must come to the chancery on Dec. 2 "to inspect the acts of the case" against him for providing evidence in the adultery case of the Rev. James A. Verrecchia and Nancy Lambert. Her ex-husband, Jim A. Lambert, sued the diocese for its failure to stop the affair that resulted in the breakup of his marriage. The lawsuit was dismissed as untimely during the summer.

The bishop decreed in an Oct. 28 notice that Father Haley was to be permanently suspended. The notice said that Father Haley's testimony violated a church canon "regarding illegitimate harm to the reputation of another and the right of privacy of all believers, as well as [a canon] regarding the right of defense in an appropriate ecclesiastical forum." "[The] public availability of extremely scandalous and defamatory material in his deposition warrants immediate action."

The bishop said he had consulted with experts in canon law and "the field of psychology, and have also sought fraternal advice from other diocesan bishops" before taking the step to remove Father Haley permanently without any judicial proceeding within the church.

Bishop Loverde yesterday declined to comment on the matter. Diocese spokeswoman Linda Shovlain said the bishop "strongly holds the principle that canonical and confidential matters involving him and/or any priest of the Diocese of Arlington are not discussed in the media." She added: "Bishop Loverde has not and will not punish anyone for bringing him a concern or complaint about a diocesan priest, employee or volunteer. Father Haley's ecclesiastical status will be determined according to canonical processes."

Roman Catholic Faithful (RCF), a national watchdog group, obtained a copy of Father Haley's 225-page July deposition in the Lambert case from the public court record, said President Stephen Brady of Petersburg, Ill. The group had posted the deposition on its Web site.

"We were trying to help Jim Lambert. Father Haley had no part in our posting the deposition on the Internet," Mr. Brady said yesterday in an interview. "RCF was greatly offended by what was going on in Arlington, and we wanted to get the facts out to the Catholic public. I couldn't understand how a bishop could tolerate even the appearance of impropriety in the breakup of [the Lambert] family."

James Bendell, RCF's attorney, who is based in Port Townsend, Wash., said Arlington authorities should investigate the bishop's action against the priest. "Because Father Haley was under subpoena to appear and testify in [the Lambert] case, RCF believes that the relevant prosecuting authorities in Virginia should closely examine Loverde's conduct to see if his actions may constitute intimidation of a witness in a civil proceeding," he said.

Father Haley, former assistant pastor at three churches in the diocese, referred inquiries to his attorney, Gregory L. Murphy of Alexandria. Mr. Murphy called the bishop's concerns about invaded privacy rights "nothing more than a red herring. Father Verrecchia revealed his love affair with Mrs. Lambert when he inadvertently downloaded his 300 e-mails to her from his laptop into the rectory's computer system."

Father Verrecchia was pastor at All Saints Catholic Church in Manassas. Father Haley was assigned to the church in June 1997. In the deposition, Father Haley said that he became aware of the affair in 1998. The deposition states that he provided details of the affair to Bishop Loverde in June 1999. The bishop then transferred Father Haley to St. Lawrence Church in Alexandria a month later.

Bishop Loverde took no action when Father Verrecchia denied the affair, or even after it became known he had impregnated Mrs. Lambert in December 1999, Mr. Murphy said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: clericalcorruption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Desdemona
It's not a crime against the faith

Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife is not against the faith?

21 posted on 11/13/2002 9:02:08 AM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: F-117A
It's a sin. Those are forgivible. Against the faith, yes, but a sin.

The whole thing is just bad news.
22 posted on 11/13/2002 9:46:46 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: robowombat
What is really sad about this kind of problem is the scandal it creates among the faithful, especially the young. One of my brothers, we think had a vocation. The priest he wanted to pattern his life after ran off with a nun, quit the priesthood and got married. My brother was in the eigth grade when it happened and was absolutely crushed. He would've made a good priest.

These guys seem to not care how many lives they destroy when they selfishly wander around the flesh of another person, male or female. I think that this is the very reason why we have a priest shortage. Honestly, what is so heroic about satisfying an illicit desire of the flesh. And what God in His right mind would favor a Church with new priests under such conditions?

25 posted on 11/13/2002 10:12:00 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F-117A; Desdemona
Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife is not against the faith?

That's the Ninth Commandment; what about the Sixth Commandment: Thou shall not commit adultery?

Verrachi and Jim Lambert's wife are living as man and wife; even though she has not received an annulment from her Catholic marriage. As far church law is concerned, they continue to live in an adulterous state of mortal sin, yet they brought up the "offertory gifts" at the daughter's First Communion, in a "Catholic" church in Dallas, while Jim Lambert painfully watched.

Amchurch at its finest.

26 posted on 11/13/2002 4:52:02 PM PST by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
What rally needs to be emphasized is that inside the Catholic church, at the moment, some bishops (not all by any means) are not doing their jobs.

In the US, most are not doing their jobs.

Plain and simple. We don't like it, but we have no control over it.

True enough, but the Holy Father does, yet he does nothing. John Paul "the Great" indeed.

27 posted on 11/14/2002 8:41:57 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Another article.
28 posted on 11/14/2002 9:53:21 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Siobhan; patent; Polycarp; NYer; Notwithstanding; Catholicguy; Romulus; eastsider; ...
PING!
29 posted on 11/14/2002 11:05:55 AM PST by ltlflwr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
I sure hope Fr. Haley fights this through the canon law courts all the way to Rome. I think the bishop is greatly exceeding his authority, not to mention putting Fr. Haley in a bind by forcing him to choose between contempt of court charges and disobeying his bishop. There are situations in which a bishop could command his flock not to cooperate with civil authority, but protecting an adulterous ex-priest isn't one of them, IMO.

I completely agree with your opinion.

30 posted on 11/14/2002 11:08:15 AM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
at the moment, some bishops (not all by any means) are not doing their jobs.

It really busted my chops to see Law standing up and waxing authoritatively at this current plenary thing. IMHO, he should be stoned out of the Church.

31 posted on 11/14/2002 3:21:39 PM PST by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; Campion
**I sure hope Fr. Haley fights this through the canon law courts all the way to Rome.**

Ditto!
32 posted on 11/14/2002 6:56:49 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson