Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
Velikovsky is generally regarded as a crackpot, I think. I remember one of his claims, that a comet turned into the planet Venus, which is scientific nonsense. Will Durant was not an expert on this period of history either. There are a lot of good books dealing with the ancient Near East which cover the Hittites. Their kingdom did collapse rather suddenly, about the same time several other states were destroyed.

I heard a lecture once by an archaeologist about a Hittite site in Syria or Turkey. The speaker described how they had found some sculptures and that they knew immediately that they had to be Hittite, because they were so ugly.

13 posted on 01/19/2003 12:25:25 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
"Their kingdom did collapse rather suddenly, about the same time several other states were destroyed."

Can you give me a 'ballpark' date? I'll look and see what the tree ring record shows for that time. (We've had a number of 'Dark Ages.')

14 posted on 01/19/2003 12:33:30 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
Velikovsky is generally regarded as a crackpot, I think.

And Reagan is "generally regarded" as a moron. So what?

When Albert Einstein died the book by his bed was Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision. He was rereading it. This is the book that talks about the comet that became the planet Venus, so it would seem that you are suggesting that Einstein would spend his time with "scientific nonsense," and then return to it.

If you take a look at the correspondence between Einstein and Velikovsky I think you will find (I haven't looked at it in a long time.) that Einstein initially rejected Worlds in Collision and suggested to Velikovsky that he should have published Ages in Chaos first.

Ages in Chaos is where Velikovsky suggests that the Hittites never existed.

Will Durant was not an expert on this period of history either.

I'm sure you have great credentials, but I wonder why you resort to an ad hominem here. Do you have reason to object to the sentence I quoted from Durant's history. If so, bring it forward. If not, maybe you would be wiser to lurk when these matters are being discussed.

ML/NJ

17 posted on 01/20/2003 5:54:16 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson