Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State GOP Chair to Attend Gay Republican Dinner
South Florida Sun-Sentinel ^ | 6/3/03 | Buddy Nevins

Posted on 06/03/2003 8:39:38 AM PDT by sofloridian

State GOP Chair to Attend Gay Republican Dinner

State GOP Chairwoman Carole Jean Jordan is scheduled to eat dinner tonight with the gay Broward Log Cabin Club, wading into the debate on how much influence gays and lesbians should have in the Republican Party.

"It's a big step for her to come to our dinner," said Andy Eddy, spokesman for the club.

The Broward County branch of the national Log Cabin Republicans was the first chapter approved by the state party four years ago. A Tampa chapter was approved later.

"At first it was a shock to the party, but it isn't any more," Eddy said. "The shock is over."

Other Republicans are not so sure.

The Log Cabin Club's views are "basically contrary to our views as Republicans and as stated in the Republican platform," said Margaret Hostetter, a Republican activist who is outspoken in her opposition to gay rights.

The Log Cabin supports both the inclusion of sexual orientation in civil rights laws and same-sex marriage, two positions that the national Republican platform rejects. The 2000 national Republican platform states that the GOP opposes the "distortion" of civil rights laws to cover sexual orientation and endorses the Defense of Marriage Act to prevent states from being forced to recognize same-sex unions.

Jordan could not be reached for comment. Geoffrey Becker, the state party's executive director, said she has made it her habit to meet with any Republican.

"The chairman meets with all types of people, not necessarily only those who reflect her views," Becker said. "It's part of expanding our party." ...

It's a discussion that has been going on in the national party since a meeting in early May between White House aides and 200 members of various Log Cabin chapters from across the country. Socially conservative Republicans protested and have threatened to sit on their hands in next year's presidential election unless President Bush puts some distance between himself and gay activists.

Among those who are upset is Ken Connor, president of the Washington-based Family Research Council.

Connor wrote to council members in May that White House staffers' "incessant pandering to the homosexual lobby is deeply troubling. If the GOP does not stand for the sanctity of marriage, then traditional-values voters have little reason to give the party their loyalty." ...

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; jordan; logcabin; logcabinrepublicans; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: sofloridian
I just can't understand the pandering to 2% of the population, 90% of whom will never vote for you.

Just how many votes will the Log Cabin Gays get you in Broward County? 100, more or less?

How many votes do you lose by being seen as a gay agenda supporter in Broward County? 500, more or less?

21 posted on 06/03/2003 9:21:53 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Politics: America Fifty/Fifty

In the end, cultural disputes and widespread dismay over the country’s moral state overshadowed the economic optimism that was expected to put Al Gore in the White House, allowing Bush to eke out a victory.

All this goes to confirm that, to borrow a title from an earlier First Things article, "It’s the Culture, Stupid" (April 1994).

As political scientist Walter Dean Burnham has suggested, such complex party coalitions are best described by geological metaphors. Today the ancient ethnoreligious bedrock of vote choice has been eroded by rising tides of disengagement, while simultaneously being fractured by the upheavals of cultural politics. Indeed, the religious formations we saw in 2000 have been developing for some time and have now solidified. This fact has vital ramifications for governance. In the future Republicans will remain solicitous of traditionalists, and evangelical traditionalists in particular, while Democrats will privilege the concerns of religious minorities, secularists, and modernists. Regardless of well-meaning admonitions to both parties to "move to the center," ignoring such large core constituencies would be political suicide.

What is needed is "bridging" social capital: activity that reaches beyond the religious group itself to work with others on causes that involve "loving thy neighbor," but are not purely sectarian in nature. Traditionalist Protestants and Roman Catholics are remarkably generous in donating their time and energy to worthy causes: we find (as Putnam did) that they are much more engaged on the whole than religious liberals or secular people. But they are also more likely to volunteer in ways that bond them with one another, serving the needs of people within the community of faith, rather than connect to the needs of others beyond the fold. In this respect, the declining number of mainline Protestants is particularly disturbing, for this group

Republicans Confident Gay Rights Issue Will Hurt DeanRichard White (search), a Republican state senator from Mississippi, said any candidate talking about gay rights might as well not even visit his state.

"The people down here, they are not going to put up with that kind of stuff," White said. "We're not prepared for all that in Mississippi or anywhere else in the southern states."

Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group

Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of U.S. vice president Dick Cheney, has resigned from the board of the Republican Unity Coalition slightly more than one year after taking on the largely honorary post with the gay-straight political alliance.

Cheney, who once marketed beer to the gay and lesbian community as an employee of the Coors Brewing Co. of Golden, Colo., has been one of the few key gay rights supporters with close ties to the White House.

A source close to the Cheney family said Mary Cheney's resignation from RUC will allow her to pursue business interests in her home state of Colorado, where she lives with her partner, Heather Poe. But some gay activists suggest that there may be more behind the decision, since it comes on the heels of protests from the religious right regarding pro-gay comments by GOP chairman Marc Racicot. "Leaders of the extreme right are demanding that the GOP back away from any association with the gay community," said David Smith, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington, D.C., gay rights group. "The Right is calling into question what little outreach the party had to gay voters at the crossroads of an election season. While I can't speculate on the reasons for her decision, Mary Cheney's departure definitely comes at an interesting time."

Poll: Pennsylvanians behind Santorum in gay issue

The vast majority of the state's voters -- 75 percent -- said Santorum should not resign as Senate Republican Conference chairman, while 58 percent said homosexuality was morally wrong, the Quinnipiac University poll said. [CNN leaves out the Quinnipiac also says ONLY 27% finds the behavior Acceptable]

If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery."

Still, 55 percent approved of the senator with 33 percent disapproving of his performance and 12 percent undecided.

22 posted on 06/03/2003 9:26:10 AM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sofloridian; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal
What is it with Florida Republicans and the gay agenda? Mark Foley is . . . well, at least very supportive of same. Bill McCollum is pro-gay. Mario Diaz-Balart just signed a pro-transgender petition. And now the state party chair goes to the Log Cabin.

Queer . . . (yes, that was a pun)

23 posted on 06/03/2003 9:32:01 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
How does your position differ from "pro-choice" politicians like Mario Cuomo who are personally opposed to abortion but support a woman's "right to choose"? Even Bill Clinton wnated abortion to be "safe, legal, and rare".

Your insinuation that those who oppose the treatment of homosexuality as a normal and acceptable lifestyle are haters is a red herring and illogical to boot. It reeks of a standard liberal ploy, for example, accusing a person opposing affirmative action of being a racist. Whether one relies on the numerous Biblical injunctions against homosexuality (q.v. Romans 1:26-27) or on the historical evidence of the societal decay that follows widespread sexual license (ancient Rome and Greece), there are numerous, sound reasons to oppose the movement to tolerate and even welcome sodomy. There are many reasons to support laws that prohibit DWI. Are Mothers Against Drunk Driving and similar anti-DWI advocacy groups made up of haters of alcoholics or drug abusers? Jews amd Muslims dislike Christian proselytizers recruiting members from their respective faith communities. Does that make them anti-Christian bigots?

Your statement that "passing judgement in this case is best left to God" is a paraphrase of the Sermon on the Mount, specifically Luke 6:37, "Judge not, and ye shall not be judges." Your paraphrase is taken out of the context of the sermon, which was based on the Pharisees, who judged unrighteously, using human and not divine standards. In other places in the Bible, unrighteous or uninformed judgement is condemned. Yet these admonitions do not preclude judgement based on righteous principles. "Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?" (I Corinthians 6:2) Homosexuality, lesbianism, and indeed all sex outside of monogamous, heterosexual marriage, are frequently condemned in both the Old and the New Testament. To pass judgement on an unreprentant sexual sinner is not only permitted by Scripture, but is a good and necessary consequence of adhering to Biblical principles.

Whether or not embracing homosexuals in the GOP is sound politicial strategy may be debated. However, the immorality and destructiveness of permissiveness in this matter cannot, based on both Biblical injunction and human experience.

24 posted on 06/03/2003 10:06:54 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Yes, I do believe there are homosexuals who live otherwise normal lives, and have the same concerns about government waste, national defense, and the end of social programs
25 posted on 06/03/2003 10:16:05 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Tip the Pizza guy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dilly; The Old Hoosier
Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to GUNS? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their GUNS, it's disturbing. Time to grow up.

Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to TAX MONEY? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their TAX MONEY it's disturbing. Time to grow up.



Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to MORALITY? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their MORALITY it's disturbing. Time to grow up.


Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to DEMOCRAT PARTY? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their DEMOCRAT PARTY it's disturbing. Time to grow up.


Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to CHILDREN? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their CHILDREN it's disturbing. Time to grow up.

Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to EDUCATION? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their EDUCATION it's disturbing. Time to grow up.

Why can't you respond to a story about politics without referring to EVIL? Some people on this board are so obsessed with what other people do with their EVIL it's disturbing. Time to grow up.




26 posted on 06/03/2003 10:29:12 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
The sun sentinal's political reporter is a homosexual. This is a push to normalise homosexuals. "See just because we want to recruit your children, does not make us eeevil." Moral relativity is their goal. To try and factionalize the GOP like the Democrats are factionalized into special interest groups.

It is all about right and wrong and homosexuals are wrong. If there was an uncontroverted gene would homosexuals oppose parents aborting fetuses with the gay gene? yes, and they would pass a law.

Judge from what I have seen of aides education funding, its a political payoff.
27 posted on 06/03/2003 10:35:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Wow, seven straw men in one post! I think that might be an FR record.
28 posted on 06/03/2003 10:35:32 AM PDT by Dilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
"Judge from what I have seen of aides education funding, its a political payoff."

Is there funding for the education of aides? I hadn't heard of this.
29 posted on 06/03/2003 10:52:19 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I have thought for a long time that "buddy " was gay,but he has a wife and children.
30 posted on 06/03/2003 10:58:01 AM PDT by samantha (Don't panic, the adults are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Your insinuation that those who oppose the treatment of homosexuality as a normal and acceptable lifestyle are haters is a red herring and illogical to boot.

I do not accept it as normal behavior. I think you miss the point of compassion for the "sinner but not the sin". Sort of like "he who without sin cast the first stone".Your statement that "passing judgment in this case is best left to God"

It just my humility before God and all that I'am not perfect. I will accept responsibility my sins and know that I'am forgiven. I'am not worthy to condemn my fellow man for sins for which they must be judged by God. To do otherwise I would have to assume the role of God, last I checked I was not divine nor a saint.

As for homosexual acts, I find it repulsive. What should I do? kill them, stone them? last I checked that is a sin within itself. I have to be honest and call the acts reprehensible. I have to be like Jesus love then in spite of themselves and hope someday they will find Christ.

31 posted on 06/03/2003 11:13:39 AM PDT by darkwing104
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sofloridian
Homosexuality is an undermining influence for the GOP, because the vast majority of elected Republicans are directly representing the anti-homosexual and pro-family groups. It's a laugh riot to think that their vote will do anything significant to help the GOP in any election, because there's so few of them and most of them are concentrated in areas that aren't really competitive for the GOP anyway (CA, NY, Vermont, etc). No southern state GOP (including FL) can afford be pro-homosexual, because of the strong, pro-family feel to the region. And I can't imagine why President Bush doesn't take a stronger stand against homosexuality. I mean, it's obvious - he isn't pro-gay, even Ari Fleischer the other day said that the President opposed homosexual marriages and gay civil unions. But Mr. Bush is unwilling to make really strong, Sanotorum-like stands on the issue, which would only help the President's cause. I can only pray that he'll learn that he and homosexuals have absolutely nothing in common.

Those homosexuals are never going to be anything but a hindrance to the GOP. And this FL chairwoman is wasting her time. Being pro-family isn't going out of style.
32 posted on 06/03/2003 11:14:35 AM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
How's it going JohnnyZ! I appreciate when you send me a message now and again.

As far as the FL GOP goes, I have most of the state's congressional delegation as having pretty strong anti-homosexual voting records (thankfully). There are a couple of RINOs like you say Mark Foley (who's questionable himself), Mario Diaz-Balart and McCollum. Fortunately, Jeb Bush seems pretty straight on the issue (pun intended). And GOP-controlled FL Legislature doesn't seem to be too friendly to gays.

But, you're right, someone has told the FL GOP (and quite a few other states, too) that being (or appearing) pro-homosexual is the way to go. It isn't. The way to be is to properly represent the core values of the Republican Party, and that underscores the promotion and preservation of the family.
33 posted on 06/03/2003 11:27:20 AM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Republicans in states where gays are not nearly as closeted are preparing themselves for the aftermath of the upcoming Supreme Court decision. Either way, it has big impact. If the Supremes rule in favor of Texas, the backlash will make the Boy Scout controversy look like a playground fight. If the Court rules (as I think is most likely) that this is private activity, the screaming from the wounded (bandwidth use here at FR will exceed anything since 9/11/2001) will alienate a lot of economically conservative gay voters. It will take some soothing by party leaders to make things OK by Election Day, 2004.

Hopefully, this thing will subside by then, and we will move on to serious threats to our country, like Muslim terrorists.

34 posted on 06/03/2003 11:28:30 AM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hunter112; No Dems 2004
hunter, I don't think that case will be a big deal, unless the Court equates sexuality with race or something.

NoD, been busy with the NC GOP convention this past weekend, and partially shut off from computer access. Hopefully I can drive some more scoreboard watching on GOP gains later this month! Today we have the NJ primaries, of course, with RINOs ready to be taken out, and did you see the Minnesota threads, with some senate DFLers possibly caucusing with the GOP?

35 posted on 06/03/2003 11:37:33 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Just how many votes will the Log Cabin Gays get you in Broward County? 100, more or less?

That's an interesting question, but Republican strategists ask themselves a different question:

How do we attract moderate voters without alienating social conservative?

The Broward County chapter of Log Cabin Republicans has members from South Florida, not just Broward County. South Florida has about 5 million people, but let’s be conservative and assume 4 million people. Let’s assume that at least 1 million of those are minors, so we only have 3 million potential voters. Let’s assume that half of the adults don’t vote, we only have 1.5 million voters. Let’s assume that 5% of those voters are gay, (although gays are overrepresented here), so we have at least 75,000 gay voters. Assuming that only 25% vote Republican, we have almost 19,000 votes.

Furthermore, the reason the Republican Party is trying to project a softer image on gays is to attract the swing voters; take my wife, for example, a moderate voter who voted for Clinton and GW Bush. She will never vote for a Republican candidate perceived to be mean to gays, such as Dole was portrayed in the media after returning a contribution from the Log Cabin Republicans.

36 posted on 06/03/2003 11:57:38 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
No Christian denies that all men are sinners and fall short of the glory of God, as Paul states in Romans 3:23. However, this realization does not emasculate Christians of their duty to seek righteousness, as Jesus commands us to do in Matthew 6:33, or to speak the truth in love, as Ephesians 4:15 admonishes us to do. Too often, many people have taken the "judge not" principle out of context and deny the proper role of God's Word in disciplining the church and promoting decency in public affairs. The results of this refusal to condemn sin are evident both in the church, where unrepentant fornicators and other sinners sit in the pews or even stand in the pulpit, and in society, where lewd and disgusting behavior is as ubiquitous as dirt.

Clearly, no human being can condemn another to hell for their sins; this is the sole prerogative of God. Despite this dividing line, parents are given clear resposibility in teaching and enforcing Biblical principles in the family (q.v. Proverbs 22:6 on teaching a child and Proverbs 13:24 on discipline). The civil magistrate is also enjoined to follow Biblical principles. "And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him." (Deut. 1:16). The church is also to discipline its members that are known sinners. In I Corinthians 5, the apostle Paul admonishes the leaders of that church to expel known fornictors, covetous, idolators, et. al. "Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person." (I Cor. 5:13) Nor are Biblical principles restricted to the spheres of family, civil government, and church government. Jesus's statement that if we are to love Him we must keep His commandments does not make exception in the workplace or the marketplace.

When American Christians insisted on righteous behavior on the part of their civil, church, and cultural leaders, this nation was a city on a hill, a nation that, to paraphrase de Tocqueville, was great because it was good. When American Christians retreat from their duties as parents, citizens, church members, and members of society, moral chaos and societal breakdown ensue.

37 posted on 06/03/2003 12:07:02 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All
The GOP will never support the homo agenda. Vote for the most conservative person in all GOP primaries. This is a futile effort on the part of the "log cabin" group, but I guess everyone needs a hobby. Praise the Almighty!!!
38 posted on 06/03/2003 12:07:03 PM PDT by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: sofloridian
Conservative tiny-tenters don't even want a tent, anymore. They want a sno-cone. " 'Sno homo votes wanted." "'Sno pro-abortion votes wanted." "'Sno way we want to be the majority party."
40 posted on 06/03/2003 12:19:10 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson