Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gbcdoj

***Burke was not asking that the property be given up***

Dude, what Universe are you in?


30 posted on 01/08/2006 7:56:36 PM PST by I Believe It's Not Butter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: I Believe It's Not Butter

Don't be a fool.

This is what the parishoners of St. Stan WHO STAYED LOYAL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH have to say about it all. Care to refute them?

"There is ongoing speculation about the reasons the board of directors changed corporate by-laws and assumed control over the parish finances. It is apparent that this situation exempted the board from the strict accountability required of all other parishes of the Roman Catholic Church. Contrary to public declarations, the board refused to conduct an independent financial audit by a certified public accountant, and to disclose details of parish operations, including procedures for awarding contracts and service agreements. The change of corporate bylaws was done with premeditation through amendments in 2001 and 2004. This itself is a clear violation of the original 1891 corporate bylaws, which explicitly state that corporation bylaws must be in conformance with diocesan rules, regulations and requirements."

Thus the dispute is not over property, but violation of canon law, the actualy original rules of the parish, etc. This rebelleion was begun in 2001 when the lay board WITHOUT ANY PROPER AUTHORITY VIOLATED THE RULES OF THE PARISH. The issue is AUTHORITY.


32 posted on 01/09/2006 3:47:23 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson