To: marshmallow; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; betty boop; ...
Thousands of years ago, somewhere in Africa, lived a man who probably had no idea that he, among all the other men in his group, would go on to become humankinds most recent common male ancestor. Scientists would call him Adam. Wait.... what?
Haven't we been told enough that mankind could not have come from a single ancestor because there wasn't enough genetic diversity?
25 posted on
08/05/2013 9:54:06 AM PDT by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: metmom
The whole idea that the “originals” of all created kinds, including mankind, had all the genetic information necessary to make all that we see today
is opposite of the “sans God” explanation of what we see today.
46 posted on
08/05/2013 11:10:07 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: metmom
Thanks for the ping, dear sister in Christ!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson