[ebb tide]

The francisheritcs' counterattacks against the "correction" commences.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

But several prominent theologians and scholars said the accusations are marked by hypocrisy and represent a marginal fringe view among academics. They noted that the 62 signatories of the letter are mainly obscure figures, with some even listed with relatively minor descriptions such as “diocesan priest” or “religious.”

No standing.

[miss marmelstein]

Well,of course they’re “marginal figures”: they’ve been marginalized by the heretics who have the ear of the media.

[ConorMacNessa]

Pure ad hominem - they have nothing else.

__"We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace!"

[RitaOK]

Written by a correspondent for the National Catholic Reporter, assigned to La Stampa.

Denigrating the signers was expected by all concerned parties. Now we can we observe which cardinals will take up the name calling, or duck, dodge and weave from questions by reporters.

[raiderboy]

This is a schism.

[Unam Sanctam]

St. Athanasius was rather a marginal figure in his day. Athanasius contra mundum! God bless these signatories!

[ebb tide]

Scholars say correction of Francis for ’heresy’ marked by hypocrisy, lack of signatories

How many co-signatories did St Athanasius have?

And for McElwees's information: combined, both One Peter Five and LifeSite News, have over 7900 signatures on petitions of faithful Catholics supporting the correction.

[Fedora]

Richard Gaillardetz, a noted theologian at Boston College

A noted center of liberation theologian heretics.

[boatbums]

“The signatories also attack Pope Francis for his attitude to Martin Luther, and yet, their own judging of what is acceptable for a pope to teach is nothing short of Protestantism; it’s a DIY (do-it-yourself) Catholicism,” said Walford, who is currently at work on a book about Amoris Laetitia and recently met with Francis at the Vatican.

A point several Freepers have brought up many times here as well.