[PeterPrinciple]

Otherwise it was just all part of billions-year processes from simple organic chemistry to... everything we see today. That's the abiogenisis hypothesis, in a nutshell. ------------------------------------ Your colleges don't agree with you. a·bi·o·gen·e·sis [ˌābīōˈjenəsəs] NOUN the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances. You argue life comes form life and organic chemistry. That is not the definition. Do you accept the above as the definition of abiogenisis?

[BroJoeK]

PeterPrinciple: "Your colleges don't agree with you.

a·bi·o·gen·e·sis [ˌābīōˈjenəsəs] NOUN the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances.

You argue life comes form life and organic chemistry.
That is not the definition.
Do you accept the above as the definition of abiogenisis? "

Here's the beginning of my working definition:

"Abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life,[3][4][5][note 1] is the natural process by which life arises from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds.[6][4][7][8]
The transition from non-living to living entities was not a single event but a gradual process of increasing complexity.[9][10][11][12]"

Note the key qualifier: "gradual process of increasing complexity".

And your problem with this definition is what, exactly?