To: ebb tide
My position has simply been this: LGBT people may not be criminalized because they’ve committed no crime, but neither should this position also become something to be imposed on cultures which are not yet ready to accept stuff like that,”
That is not Catholic theology. It sounds more like the Star Trek “Prime Directive”. Very condescending.
4 posted on
12/15/2023 11:24:19 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
To: Dr. Sivana
LGBT people may not be criminalized because they’ve committed no crime It's also bizarrely circular reasoning, assuming what is (but ought not to be) in dispute.
7 posted on
12/15/2023 12:56:51 PM PST by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: Dr. Sivana; .45 Long Colt; Apple Pan Dowdy; BDParrish; Big Red Badger; BlueDragon; boatbums; ...
My position has simply been this: LGBT people may not be criminalized because they’ve committed no crime, but neither should this position also become something to be imposed on cultures which are not yet ready to accept stuff like that,”
That is not Catholic theology. It sounds more like the Star Trek “Prime Directive”. Very condescending.
Sodomy is a crime, while the premise that being LGBTQBI+ translates to being celibate and continent is less realistic than that abortion is about preventing the death of the mother.
Meanwhile, with the Left in charge of the transporter, Kirk would beam up as female. Or "Other." Switching to "B."
11 posted on
12/15/2023 2:54:43 PM PST by
daniel1212
(Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson