Free Republic

I'd say that sounds a little extreme. Of course I didn't read the Caliphate, so would have no basis to make a judgement.

The oil motive doesn't seem realistic in that we already have within our own borders enough oil to last the world at least a couple of centuries . . . and that doesn't include the availabilities of the northern territories of the continent.

Nope, I'd just sweep the whole shebang out of the U.S. for failing to assimilate, they hoping instead to convert us by hook, crook, or beheading to their primitive sexually motivated political system.

Here's an opinion for you.

It's time to wipe out every pocket of this insane anti-social and bloody life-style that has been silently invading our neighborhoods and attaching itself to our constitutional Republic with their bloody and backwoods belief, slowly but surely destroying the fabric of our culture and contaminating the beliefs we have in common which underpin our laws and is overtly attacking our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

In your hearts, you know I'm right.

" . . . being manipulated into violent action, . . ."

Arguable. Many would say, including myself, that bullets are quicker, cleaner, and more humane than any other kind of violence designed to separate the body from the soul.

Certainly a helluva less traumatic and less violent than the bathing of the blood and guts of the victims the crazies bathe themselves in the during the execuation of their ritualistic mayhem while muttering some stupid mantra to their dog that removes their consciences from the act they are performing.

I think I’d rather hear something that the Church of Christ does believe in, something a little more positive than this devisive stuff that keeps Christians (and others) separated. All you are doing is bragging about how much better and holier y’all are for wearing your panties a little tighter than the rest of us.

"I’m pointing out: when has the Constitution stopped anyone in this administration or crop of liberal Democrats?"

I doubt if anything will stop this downhill freight train of illegal abuses unless it becomes too costly for them to continue intruding; costly in terms of overcoming the resistance of We the People and costly in terms of finding replacements for their hunters.

One important point the enemy has overlooked is that once a person has lived as a free person, they would rather die than live any other way.

If they didn't overlook that point, you can bet they will be building cemeteries instead of internment camps.

The victor will be determined by who has the most ammo.

The gummint's massive purchase of bullets that is illegal to use on another country should be cause for great concern -- and planning.

Dear thirst4truth.

I'm sorry I have to say this, but no one can advise you what to do anymnore. You are entirely resposible for whatever action you take. Consider that anything that you choose to do is already, or soon to be illegal, even though it's Constitutional.

The issue will be settled for me at my front door, if and when that hour comes.

I honestly don't know what I'll do until that moment, but my daddy didn't raise a coward or a slave.

Congress can pass no law that is not in pursuance to the Bill of Rights/Constitution. In other words, you can't pass a law to outlaw the supreme law of the land, which, by the way, is the Bill of Rights/U.S. Constitution. (Article VI, para 2)

Thes same article delineates the pecking order of laws, treaty laws, and state laws. You can't pass a treaty law that is not in pursuance to the U.S. Constitution. Further, no state or judge can pass a law that is not in pursuance to the supreme law of the land.

Please get that straight and stop empowering anyone with the right or the idea that they can disarm us. The Second Amendment cannot be infringed upon because it is part of the Supreme Law of the Land.

If the gummint wants to infringe on our gun rights by hook or crook, they will. But they will be in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land and would be guilty of tyranny and should be treated like any other tyrant.

And more than that, because they would be in violation of their oath to preserve and protect the U.S. Constitution, their primary reason for being elected to office.

"Tell us what you think about this response and We the People."

When it comes to altering or removing any of my Bill of Rights be advised that I am a majority of one and notwithstanding my lack of public response, I did not nor will I authorize any individual, agency, political body, or government official to speak or act in my stead concerning any infringements on my rights.

Be not deceived. It would be a serious mistake for anyone to assume otherwise or to not believe that governments are created by me and We the People to protect and preserve those rights -- not to alter, change or destroy them.

Well, pump my nickel. Who’d a thought it?

Make no mistake, bro. That is why we fight!!

Ditto, me too, likewise, 10/4, roger dodger, bro; hang 10, power to the poopies.

"It wasn't a speech"

Lib/commie motto: Never let a tragedy go without exploiting exery aspect of it it, even if your remarks don't fit the situation. Always sandwich your attack on people's rights between the peanut butter and the jelly.

Like your infamous boo boo to create your private police force, just as powerful and as large as the U.S. Military.

Hit them while they are chanting hypnotically and not listening to what you are saying anymore.

"Let those states that wish to leave secede from the United States"

Maybe have a national referendum first.

If those who want to secede outnumber those that don't, give those who want to secede a choice to stay and preserve the union, mandating that other state and federal employees and elected officials re-constitute our constitutional Republic or hit the road, Jack, and don'tcha come back no mo'.

Then we start over with a clean slate, eliminating all the non-constitutional laws, treaties, executive orders, etc., and all infringements.

I think that would be fulfilling the requirement of the states who want to petition for new federal and state officials without destroying the infra-structure and insuring continuity of government.

That would leave our constitutional Republic intact without spilling a whole lot of blood.

So what is it? Petition favoring gun laws or a petition against gun laws? Very confusing header.

Is that something like “Pippers, Pliss?”

"Mistake my ass."

Yup! SOP for the dingbats.

"I took about 5 minutes of this leftist loving pap and shut him off."

You lasted longer than me. I anticipated what he was going to say and I wasn't disappointed. I think I'm done with Savage. I liked his rants, but not his liberalism. It seems that's all he has left except for his super agrandizing portions of me, me, me, I, I, I, ad infinitum, ad absurdum.

I'm willing to bet he's going to lose half of his listeners over his unfortunate choice tonight. Blaming this primarily on guns is as bad as the stupid reporter wanting to interview one of the school kids. Bad timing, Doc. I though you were more discerning than that, but I don't think it's any of your damn business how many and what kind of guns I buy.

Sorry, all. But I think he really jumped the shark tonight.

Hello, Mr. Straw, meet Mr. Back. Hello, Bridge. Meet Mr. Torch.

The Savage Nation is now available on seven day archive on KSFO. Click on tiny link on top of page one.

Your right. It’s too small. In fact, it’s the wrong pix I selected by accident. Sorry about that.

Yes, you’re probbly right. But the pix I posted was not the Rivera plane. Sorry about that. Bad picture placement with the Rivera story.