Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $20,503
25%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 25%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: mandamus

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • USWGO News Brian Hill petitions Supreme Court for rehearing to rule on Fourth Circuit denying mandamus on Judge refusing to act on motions

    10/15/2020 9:05:30 PM PDT · by StanleyBolten · 3 replies
    USWGO News Brian Hill petitions Supreme Court for rehearing to rule on Fourth Circuit denying mandamus on Judge refusing to act on motions by Laurie Azgard Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news who was sued by Righthaven LLC in 2011 as documented by Reporters Without Borders, had filed a petition for rehearing in his Supreme Court case to undo the criminal-level frauds upon the court and perjury by compelling the DisHonorable Judge Thomas David Schroeder to act upon four uncontested pending motions to vacate all fraudulent begotten judgments in favor of the government. Uncontested means that under the rules...
  • US Court of Appeals grants EnBanc Hearing for Gen. Flynn 9:30 am August 11

    07/30/2020 10:01:08 AM PDT · by Pete from Shawnee Mission · 138 replies
    US Court of Appeals Columbia District ^ | July 30, 2020 | United States Court of Appeals
    United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 20-5143 September Term, 20191:17-cr-00232-EGS-1Filed On: July 30, 2020In re: Michael T. Flynn,Petitioner BEFORE:Srinivasan, Chief Judge, and Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland,Griffith, Millett, Pillard, Wilkins, Katsas*, and Rao, Circuit Judges US Court of Appeals Columbia District O R D E R Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and the vote in favor of rehearing en banc by a majority of the judges eligible to participate, it is ORDERED that this case be reheard by the court sitting en banc. It is FURTHER ORDERED that...
  • Lose the Battle, win the War: The Story of Marbury v. Madison

    07/19/2014 9:12:40 AM PDT · by Oldpuppymax · 14 replies
    Coach is Right ^ | 7/19/14 | Michael D. Shaw
    Do you know that the verdict in this case actually limited the Court’s power? Following the loss of the presidency and Congress in the election of 1800, the lame-duck Federalist Congress enacted the Judiciary Act of February 3, 1801, creating 58 new federal judgeships and new circuit courts. Two weeks later, Congress created 42 justices of the peace in the District of Columbia. Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth resigned, and President John Adams named Secretary of State John Marshall to replace him. The judicial commissions were signed by President Adams, and the Seal of the United States affixed by the Secretary...
  • Supreme Court might leave 'wiggle room'(Mandamus petitions to bring TX Dems back)

    09/06/2003 10:51:58 AM PDT · by jmstein7 · 18 replies · 215+ views
    KERA ^ | 2003-08-12 | By J. Lyn Carl, GalleryWatch.com
    Note to readers: all that was decided here is that the Texas Supreme Court is not the court of original jurisdiction -- the court to start the action in. Even that was not deemed a final judgment, as the case was not dismissed "on the merits" -- i.e. the issue is still open to suit. -- BEGIN ARTICLE -- Monday's order by the Texas Supreme Court, a one-sentence denial of a petition for a writ of mandamus, was amended later in the day with another single-sentence from three of the nine members of the court. The original order denied a...