Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $33,677
41%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 41%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: presbushknesset08

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Barack Obama vs. John McCain on foreign policy

    05/20/2008 12:21:10 PM PDT · by Ernest_at_the_Beach · 14 replies · 538+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | May 19, 2008 | Don Frederick
    One was in the Midwest, the other in the far West. But in competing speeches today, John McCain and Barack Obama continued an intensifying debate, ratcheting up the rhetoric in their core dispute over the posture the U.S. should assume in international negotiations. McCain, venturing into Obama's hometown of Chicago to address a meeting of the National Restaurant Assn. (many of whose members are reliable Republicans, due to their opposition to minimum wage raises), said the Democrat "betrays the depth" of his "inexperience and reckless judgment" in his call for an American president to be willing to talk with opposing...
  • John Bolton on Appeasement

    05/20/2008 8:28:24 AM PDT · by moderatewolverine · 12 replies · 131+ views
    Primetime Politics ^ | May 20, 2008 | John Bolton
    John Bolton was on Fox News' Hannity and Colmes a couple of days ago to discuss the left's reaction to Bush's appeasement comments...
  • The Obama-Ahmedinejad Summit

    05/20/2008 5:06:03 AM PDT · by vietvet67 · 18 replies · 86+ views
    American Thinker ^ | May 20, 2008 | Ed Lasky
    "Obama is the only major candidate who supports tough, direct, presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions." - Barackobama.com Barack Obama has enshrined the principle of unconditional summitry with Iran as one of the central foreign policy planks of his campaign for President. This despite recent efforts by Obama surrogates to confuse the electorate. The statement above is found on the campaign website of Senator Obama and reflects his view -- repeated a number of times by himself in debates and question and answer sessions -- that the thrust of his foreign policy will be personal Presidential engagement with tyrannical regimes...
  • Echoes of Jimmy Carter

    05/19/2008 6:18:06 PM PDT · by Stepan12 · 12 replies · 159+ views
    The Jewish Advocate ^ | May 15, 2008 | Tom Mountain
    At this point it’s reasonable to wonder how Jimmy Carter got elected governor of Georgia, let alone president of the United States. To witness him laying a wreath at the tomb of Yasser Arafat, then schmoozing with Hamas in Damascus, is enough to make the sane among us recoil in disgust. On the very day that the peanut-farmer-who-became-president claimed to have scored a commitment of peace from Hamas, the terrorist thugs launched a rocket salvo at Israel, thus leading the former president to claim that at least he gallantly tried to bring about peace and stability to the Middle East....
  • Don't know much about history

    05/19/2008 5:25:44 PM PDT · by crazyhorse691 · 17 replies · 71+ views
    The Oregonian ^ | May 19, 2008 | 3rdgrade graduate editors
    The president makes a clumsy reference to Nazi Germany before Israeli lawmakers Monday, May 19, 2008 E xquisitely timed, this was not. Politicians and commentators do a disservice to history when they evoke the Third Reich to make political points, as if American policy questions can be equated to state-sponsored genocide. Such comparisons dull the uniqueness of the horrors visited upon Jews, gypsies and others during the dark years between Kristallnacht and the Allies' capture of Berlin. But there stood the POTUS, on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel, addressing that country's national parliament, groping...
  • The New Appeasers

    05/19/2008 4:39:41 PM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 10 replies · 111+ views
    humanevents.com ^ | 05/19/2008 | Jed Babbin
    President Bush’s implied attack on Barack Obama -- comparing those who would negotiate with terrorists and radicals to pre-World War II appeasers -- is being written off as mere heated political rhetoric. That is happening because the president, as is his wont, expressed a correct judgment in incomplete and thus incorrect terms. Speaking to the Israeli Knesset on May 15, the president said: Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks...
  • Over the Top Barack

    05/19/2008 3:07:42 PM PDT · by lancer256 · 8 replies · 87+ views
    davidlimbaugh.com ^ | 05/19/08 | david limbaugh
    Based on Barack Obama's hysterical, paranoid reaction to President Bush's remarks to the Israeli Knesset condemning the practice of appeasing terrorists, one might infer Obama was lying in wait for just such an opportunity to capture some national security street cred. After all, Democrats begin any presidential race with a national security credibility deficit, and this one should be no different, notwithstanding the unpopularity of the Iraq war. Democrats like to think they gained congressional seats in 2006 because of the war, but a better read is that Republicans did themselves in through reckless spending, scandals and other abandonment of...
  • White House takes swipe at NBC News

    05/19/2008 1:11:05 PM PDT · by WesA · 163 replies · 693+ views
    thehill.com ^ | 5/19/2008 | Klaus Marre
    The White House on Monday sent a scathing letter to NBC News, accusing the news network of “deceptively” editing an interview with President Bush on the issue of appeasement and Iran. At issue were remarks Bush made in front of Israel's parliament earlier this week. Specifically, White House counselor Ed Gillespie laments that the network edited the interview in a way that “is clearly intended to give viewers the impression that [Bush] agreed with [correspondent Richard Engel's] characterization of his remarks when he explicitly challenged it. “This deceitful editing to further a media-manufactured storyline is utterly misleading and irresponsible and...
  • Rookie mistakes again: Obama owns appeasement

    05/17/2008 11:47:11 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 84 replies · 178+ views
    Hot Air ^ | May 16, 2008 | Ed Morrissey
    George Bush seems to have really rattled Barack Obama and the Democratic Party with his speech yesterday in the Israeli Knesset. Rather than ignoring Bush’s argument against appeasement, or adopting it, Barack Obama has declared that Bush intended his denunciation of appeasement as an attack on his campaign, even though Bush never even mentioned the nationality of modern appeasers in his speech. Obama lashed out in a speech today, calling Bush’s rhetoric “appalling”: Barack Obama has called President Bush’s comments on appeasement “exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided our country and alienates us from the rest of the...
  • Obama doth protest

    05/17/2008 11:06:11 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 35 replies · 353+ views
    The New York Daily News ^ | May 17th 2008 | The Editors
    The problem Barack Obama is stuck with - whether he likes it or not, and he doesn't - is that during this campaign he did in fact say, and moreover did in fact say several times, that as President he would be entirely willing to sit down with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other rogues with no preconditions whatsoever. That is why, for a second day Friday, the customarily unflappable Obama rather flappably chose to go on a tear over President Bush's remarks to the Israeli Knesset. He called those remarks "appalling" and "divisive" and much else, presenting himself as...
  • Bush Criticism of Appeasement Angers Dems

    05/17/2008 6:17:57 PM PDT · by John Semmens · 13 replies · 98+ views
    AZCONSERVATIVE ^ | 17 May 2008 | John Semmens
    President Bush’s speech to the Israeli parliament sparked a series of denunciations from high ranking Democrats across the country. The President’s characterization of negotiation with terrorist regimes—like the one in Iran that has called for the destruction of Israel—as “a foolish delusion” and akin to Neville Chamberlain’s negotiations with Hitler appears to have touched a nerve in Democratic circles. Although Bush did not specifically name anyone in his speech, Democratic presidential front runner, Senator Barack Obama (Ill.) called Bush’s comments an “appalling attack on my ‘peace through concessions’ strategy for making America safe. Look, we can’t afford to get involved...
  • Bush, and His Use of "Appeasement" ("Hitler's demands were not unreasonable"-Barf Alert)

    05/16/2008 4:44:50 PM PDT · by mojito · 26 replies · 501+ views
    Seattle Times ^ | 5/16/2008 | Bruce Ramsey
    Democrats are rebuking President Bush for saying in his speech to the Knesset, here, that to “negotiate with terrorists and radicals” is “appeasement.” The Democrats took it as a slap at Barack Obama. What bothers me is the continual reference to Hitler and his National Socialists, particularly the British and French accommodation at the Munich Conference of 1938. The narrative we're given about Munich is entirely in hindsight. We know what kind of man Hitler was, and that he started World War II in Europe. From the view of 1938, what Hitler was demanding at Munich was not unreasonable, according...
  • Seattle Times Editor: 'Hitler's Demands Were Not Unreasonable'

    05/16/2008 8:20:57 PM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 115 replies · 184+ views
    Seattle Times editorial writer Bruce Ramsey, in an effort to defend Barack Obama against President Bush’s “appeasement” speech, actually ends up defending Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler, and the Anschluss (the annexation of Austria): Bush, and His Use of ‘Appeasement’. Democrats are rebuking President Bush for saying in his speech to the Knesset, here, that to “negotiate with terrorists and radicals” is “appeasement.” The Democrats took it as a slap at Barack Obama. What bothers me is the continual reference to Hitler and his National Socialists, particularly the British and French accommodation at the Munich Conference of 1938. What Hitler was...
  • Obama an appeaser? How dare you

    05/17/2008 6:09:27 AM PDT · by Nony · 37 replies · 113+ views
    Orange County Register ^ | May 17, 2008 | Mark Steyn
    "That's enough. That – that's a show of disrespect to me." That was Barack Obama, a couple of weeks back, explaining why he was casting the Rev. Jeremiah Wright into outer darkness. It's one thing to wallow in "adolescent grandiosity" (as Scott Johnson of the Powerline Web site called it) when it's a family dispute between you and your pastor of 20 years. It's quite another to do so when it's the 60th anniversary celebrations of one of America's closest allies. President Bush was in Israel the other day and gave a speech to the Knesset. Its perspective was summed...
  • Angry Obama: "Appease" Is A Total Sleaze

    05/17/2008 6:23:48 AM PDT · by Fennie · 77 replies · 138+ views
    New York Post ^ | May 17, 2008 | By Charles Hurt
    WASHINGTON - Barack Obama fired back at President Bush yesterday, accusing him of an "appalling attack" for suggesting that the Democratic presidential hopeful wanted to appease America's enemies. "Now, that's exactly the kind of appalling attack that's divided our country and that alienates us from the world," Obama said. "And that's why we need change in Washington. That's part of the reason why I'm running for president of the United States of America." Speaking before the Israeli Knesset earlier this week, Bush laced into those who believe that the United States should negotiate with leaders of terrorist states. Last summer,...
  • Bush hit the nail on the head yesterday in Jerusalem. And today, the nails started to complain.

    05/17/2008 5:06:32 AM PDT · by moneyrunner · 22 replies · 96+ views
    The Virginian ^ | 5/17/2008 | Moneyrunner
    President Bush made a moving speech in Israel to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the founding of that state. The New York Sun began its editorial "Bush's Covenant" this way: As far as political reactions go, it was a weird one. President Bush gave a beautiful and moving speech in the capital of Israel to give voice to America’s solidarity with the Jewish state. He reached back to Herzl and beyond, declaring that the establishment of the State of Israel was, as the president put it, “the redemption of an ancient promise given to Abraham and Moses and David —...
  • Niny Pity Party (Mark Steyn Whack's Left's Appeasement Mindset Alert)

    05/17/2008 5:36:28 AM PDT · by goldstategop · 65 replies · 267+ views
    ‘That’s enough. That — that’s a show of disrespect to me.” That was Barack Obama, a couple of weeks back, explaining why he was casting the Reverend Jeremiah Wright into outer darkness. It’s one thing to wallow in “adolescent grandiosity” (as Scott Johnson of “Powerline” called it) when it’s a family dispute between you and your pastor of 20 years. It’s quite another to do so when it’s the 60th-anniversary celebrations of one of America’s closest allies. Last week, President Bush was in Israel and gave a speech to the Knesset. Its perspective was summed up by his closing anecdote...
  • On Israel 60th Birthday Bush Tells Iran, Syria, No Appeasement On Terrorism

    05/17/2008 1:54:46 AM PDT · by IsraelBeach · 4 replies · 526+ views
    Israel News Agency / Google News ^ | May 17, 2008 | Joel Leyden
    On Israel 60th Birthday Bush Tells Iran, Syria, No Appeasement On Terrorism By Joel Leyden Israel News Agency Jerusalem ----- May 17, 2008 ....... US President George W. Bush will leave Saudi Arabia this morning for Egypt after having visited Israel for its 60th birthday celebrations. Upon his historic arrival at Israel's Ben-Gurion Airport, Bush stated: "Israel is our strongest friend and ally in the Middle East. Our two nations both faced great challenges when they were founded. And our two nations have both relied on the same principles to help us succeed. We built strong democracies to protect the...
  • Obama Hits Back at Bush for ‘Appeasement’ Remarks (Update McCain responds and punks Obama)

    05/16/2008 12:14:59 PM PDT · by jrooney · 51 replies · 66+ views
    Fox News ^ | 05-16-08 | John McCain
    McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds fired back that Obama’s retort was a “hysterical diatribe in response to a speech in which his name wasn’t even mentioned.”
  • McCain campaign responds: 'Hysterical diatribe'

    05/16/2008 12:13:37 PM PDT · by TornadoAlley3 · 29 replies · 71+ views
    politico.com ^ | 05/16/08 | bensmith
    This general election campaign is getting off to a rollicking start. From McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds: It was remarkable to see Barack Obama’s hysterical diatribe in response to a speech in which his name wasn’t even mentioned. These are serious issues that deserve a serious debate, not the same tired partisan rants we heard today from Senator Obama. Senator Obama has pledged to unconditionally meet with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- who pledges to wipe Israel off the map, denies the Holocaust, sponsors terrorists, arms America’s enemies in Iraq and pursues nuclear weapons. What would Senator Obama talk about with...