1 posted on
06/21/2003 9:59:25 PM PDT by
cgk
To: afraidfortherepublic; AlbionGirl; anniegetyourgun; Aquinasfan; arasina; Archangelsk; A-teamMom; ...
Bump for babies!
2 posted on
06/21/2003 9:59:59 PM PDT by
cgk
(Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
To: cgk
Roe V Wade was poor law. However, this is an equally poor attempt to overturn it. Unfortunately Roe was basically a political decision by a court that wanted to have legal abortion. How do I know that? Because they based it on a right to privacy. This right to privacy does not apply to gambling, prostitution, drugs, incest, and even in some cases sodomy between consenting adults. How did this right to privacy jump over all these other cases and land on abortion? Politics is the only way I can see it. If Norma McCorvey now finds abortion disgusting, that is no more of a reason for the court to reverse its bad decision than the original decision was to make.
To: cgk
SITREP
To: cgk
Look forward to a new pro-life television commercial from Virtue Media
www.virtuemedia.org
in about a month. They started shooting the commercial this morning at St.Mary's Basilica in Phoenix, AZ. They're doing some more shoots tomorrow in Chandler, AZ, and some next week in Kingman. The commercial will be titled "Vanished".
8 posted on
06/21/2003 10:29:22 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been banned.)
To: All
Ever since I heard of this new technology, I've maintained that it is the Stealth Bomber that is going to zoom in under the pro-death crowd's radar and nuke them... once a woman sees what is really in her womb, it ceases to be a "tissue mass" and becomes... a baby. Her baby.
10 posted on
06/22/2003 1:30:25 AM PDT by
backhoe
(Abortion stills a beating heart...)
To: cgk
bump
To: cgk
"But, undeterred, Allan Parker intends to take it the next step -- and ultimately to the Supreme Court, where it belongs. "The Supreme Court should undo this deceit and merit their title of 'Justice'.
19 posted on
06/22/2003 12:15:36 PM PDT by
ex-snook
(Is outsourcing factories and jobs a conservative position?)
To: cgk
Liberalism is itself based only on lies fraud and deceit, so why should it bother them that Roe is made of the same stuff?
To: cgk
why conservatives want government regulation is beyond me.
21 posted on
06/22/2003 12:22:30 PM PDT by
liberalnot
(what democrats fear the most is real democracy. /s)
To: cgk
BTW Roe should be overturned purely because of the 10th amendment, the founders wanted the states and the states only to define criminal laws (like what constitutes murder or not) not the judiciary.
If Roe were overturned today it would be up to the states to decided whether abortion was legal or not as it should have been all along.
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Alouette; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; bulldogs; ...
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
23 posted on
06/22/2003 2:29:27 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(A lot of people, deep down, are really shallow.)
To: cgk
I certainly am no fan of Patrick Buchanan, but he seems to be right in this article.
Let's overturn Roe vs. Wade.
To: Allan
ping
25 posted on
06/22/2003 3:11:19 PM PDT by
Nogbad
To: cgk
bump for life
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson