Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Scholars Back Fight Against Terrorists
New York Times ^ | Friday, October 12, 2001 | LAURIE GOODSTEIN

Posted on 10/11/2001 9:22:17 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Muslim Scholars Back Fight Against Terrorists

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN

A panel of prominent Muslim scholars in the Middle East has issued a fatwa, or religious opinion, denouncing the terrorist attacks on the United States and saying it is the "duty" of Muslims to participate in the mission to apprehend the terrorists.

The primary purpose of the fatwa, released at a news conference yesterday in Washington, is to reassure Muslim soldiers in the American armed forces that they are permitted to fight other Muslims and Muslim countries to combat terrorism.

The fatwa was issued in response to a request by Capt. Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, a Muslim chaplain in the United States Army, who sought guidance for Muslim military personnel uneasy about being deployed in the operation against Afghanistan.

But several Muslim experts said the fatwa could have a broad impact beyond the United States by providing religious justification for Muslim nations to cooperate with the American military effort. Many Muslim counties have minimized the American presence within their borders or over their skies.

Fatwas are not binding, but this one is likely to have strong credibility throughout the Islamic world because among its five authors is a prominent scholar based in Qatar whose word is revered by many Muslims, both moderates and militants.

That scholar, Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, is regarded as an independent voice, unlike the many Islamic muftis and theologians who have been appointed by some Muslim governments. Far from pro-Western, Sheik Qaradawi has been a spiritual adviser to Muslim Brotherhood militants in Egypt, has harshly criticized the United States for supporting Israel and has condoned Palestinian suicide bombers.

"This fatwa is very significant. Yusuf Qaradawi is probably the most well-known legal authority in the whole Muslim world today," said Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, founder of the American Sufi Muslim Association, and an authority in Islamic jurisprudence. "The armed forces of other countries now have behind them a legal standing in the eyes of a noted legal authority to be part of the coalition against terrorism."

The fatwa, written in Arabic and translated into four pages of English, says: "We find it necessary to apprehend the true perpetrators of these crimes, as well as those who aid and abet them through incitement, financing or other support. They must be brought to justice in an impartial court of law and punish them appropriately, so that it could act as deterrent to them and to others like them who easily slay the lives of innocents, destroy properties and terrorize people. Hence, it's a duty on Muslims to participate in this effort with all possible means."

The fatwa condemns the terrorist attack, saying that "all Muslims ought to be united against all those who terrorize innocents," because the death of noncombatants is a clear violation of Islamic law.

The fatwa notes that American military action may also result in the death of innocent people, but that a Muslim soldier must "perform his duty in this fight despite the feeling of uneasiness of `fighting without discriminating.' " As a soldier, "he has no choice but to follow orders, otherwise his allegiance and loyalty to his country could be in doubt."

The fatwa was issued on Sept. 27 but not released until yesterday because it was being shown to other Muslim jurists in this country and overseas, said Dr. Taha Jabir Alalwani, chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, a group of Muslim scholars.

The fatwa is surprising because it appears to contradict other recent statements from Mr. Qaradawi.

In an interview on Sept. 16, on Al Jazeera television, the Arabic-language network based in Qatar, Mr. Qaradawi said, "A Muslim is forbidden from entering into an alliance with a non-Muslim against another Muslim." He called on Muslims to "fight the American military if we can, and if we cannot, we should fight the U.S. economically and politically."

It is not clear why Mr. Qaradawi has appeared to change his position.

The other authors of the fatwa include Haytham al-Khayyat, a scholar in Syria, and three Egyptian scholars who have also criticized American policy in Muslim countries: Tariq al-Bishri, a retired jurist, Muhammad S. al-Awa, a professor of law, and Fahmi Houaydi, a newspaper columnist.

It is too early to tell how the fatwa will be greeted in either the Muslim world, or among Muslims in the United States. Fatwas can be disseminated through speeches in mosques, Web sites and media coverage.

Not everyone welcomed this fatwa. Qaseem A. Uqdah, executive director of the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council, said he was outraged that such a fatwa was even sought.

Mr. Uqdah said the fatwa was a political statement of no help to enlisted Muslims, and should never have been sought because the scholars could have come to a completely different conclusion.

"Now you have opened a door for people to question, is this right or wrong," he said. "You'll have controversy looming about us just when we don't need that."

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2001 9:22:17 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Will some individual tell these beasts that the letter "q" is to be followed by the letter "u"?
2 posted on 10/11/2001 9:27:04 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
They can take their fatwa and stick it where the sun doesn't shine. The terrorists and pro-terrorists will be crashed regardless.
3 posted on 10/11/2001 9:30:18 PM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The primary purpose of the fatwa, released at a news conference yesterday in Washington, is to reassure Muslim soldiers in the American armed forces that they are permitted to fight other Muslims and Muslim countries to combat terrorism.

The fatwa was issued in response to a request by Capt. Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, a Muslim chaplain in the United States Army, who sought guidance for Muslim military personnel uneasy about being deployed in the operation against Afghanistan.

I thought the miltary took an oath to preserve, protect and defend this country. I thought that the orders of the commander in chief, as represented by their immediate superiors was the only orders they are to obey.

I would summarily discharge any Muslim military man who is taking his orders from a Muslim leader. I guess I'm naive. We are in deep trouble if this goes unnoticed and uncontradicted.

4 posted on 10/11/2001 9:32:55 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclectic
Gosh, I'm so relieved to know that one of these mullahs MUST be sincere about the fatwah giving US Muslim soldiers permission to pound Afghanistan and beyond, because he has the impeccable credentials of approving Palestinian suicide bombers. Does anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?
5 posted on 10/11/2001 9:36:21 PM PDT by ikanakattara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump for Mr. Uqdah. His statement goes straight to the heart of the baloney.
6 posted on 10/11/2001 9:41:02 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I thought that the orders of the commander in chief, as represented by their immediate superiors was the only orders they are to obey.

I would summarily discharge any Muslim military man who is taking his orders from a Muslim leader. I guess I'm naive. We are in deep trouble if this goes unnoticed and uncontradicted.

Well, it's more complicated than that. Sometimes immoral orders are given and it could conceivably be a religious duty to conscientiously object. In all such cases that I can imagine in the United States Armed Forces, however, an order sufficiently immoral that it would be sinful to obey it is also sufficiently unlawful that there would be no duty to obey it. If the regulations and military code are such that you can imagine being given a lawful order that contradicts your religious moral imperatives, then you shouldn't go into the armed forces in the first place. In particular, a Muslim who believes that it is against Islam to ally with non-Muslims against other Muslims should not join the army of a non-Muslim country!

Still, a Muslim who did NOT believe this when he joined up but is now being told it by all sorts of mullahs and imams can indeed benefit from this fatwa, so I don't have a problem with it.

7 posted on 10/11/2001 9:47:56 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
Muslim is now the latest and greatest class in the USA. Get used to it. Bush kisses their tails every single day, they are better than we are.
8 posted on 10/11/2001 9:55:09 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It is not clear why Mr. Qaradawi has appeared to change his position.

Possibly, just possibly, Qaradawi believes the terrorists are not Muslim but simply claim Islam as a pretext for their ambitions. If I understand this, though, a Muslim is not allowed to say another is not a Muslim if the other states he is a Muslim.

9 posted on 10/11/2001 9:55:42 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
If you don't like the transliteration of the Arabic gutteral which has no English equivalent by a q without a u, replace it with kh. (Though Irakh looks funny.)
10 posted on 10/11/2001 9:56:30 PM PDT by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'm waiting for the fatwa which says it's ok for Muslims in America to have religious freedom and decide for themselves if they believe Mohammed is a prophet without fear of death if they come to the conclusion that he is not a prophet.

That's a long sentence, but I think they could get it into a fatwa. I wonder when they will issue it?

11 posted on 10/11/2001 9:56:32 PM PDT by JeepInMazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclectic
"Muslim Scholars Back Fight Against Terrorists"

The real source of 'terrorism' are found in the words of the Koran. All of this is just diabolical 'spin'. When members of the worlds largest religion enter the presence of their 'higher power' five times a day and then rise up to drive the infidels out of the middle-east what does that tell you about Allah?

12 posted on 10/11/2001 9:56:57 PM PDT by God_isa_Jew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eclectic
I can't believe the replies so far to this article. Guys, this is really good news. You people don't seem to understand that a good portion of any battle is for the hearts and minds of people. We've just had well-respected Muslim scholars clearly point out that Bin Laden and his goonies are outright criminals not only according to OUR laws, but also according to Islamic law as well. And your response is to insult the people who (under potentially great pressure from bigots in their own society, I might add) are HELPING us?????! I'm glad not all Americans or like this, or I might start to believe a bit of bin Laden's propaganda against us...

Another brief comment here. From what I've heard, bin Laden's fatwas don't count for diddly squat, because he isn't the real article in terms of Muslim theological credentials. THESE guys, apparently, have genuine authority.

Translation: we've got a REAL fatwa, and bin Laden's isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

Like I said, this is good news.

13 posted on 10/11/2001 9:59:49 PM PDT by butter pecan fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ikanakattara
The Muslim custom of adopting tactics almost certain to result in the death of the soldier, and claiming the death as "martyrdom" is obnoxious to civilized morality whether Christian or pagan. It is reasonable, however, under their understanding of morality (and I think also under the moral understanding of many red-blooded Americans who call themselves Christians) to draw a distinction between killing people occupying your land (even if they bring civilians, and especially if their "civilians" are armed, as is the case with Israeli settlers) and killing civilians far way without defiance sent.
14 posted on 10/11/2001 10:03:21 PM PDT by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I believe the advantage in this is the cover it gives the fence sitting Arab Militaries the justification to not oppose us. Since the political leadership in many of these countries has promoted the sort of anti American rhetoric that the populations are now inflamed with, could their militaries look to coups to restore some sanity to their societies. The political leaderships may have bizarre ideas of our strenghts and weeknesses but their militaries do not.

They well remember the ease in which we routed the pearl of Arab military might in Iraq.

On the other hand, the true believers may gain control and we are all screwed.

knews hound

15 posted on 10/11/2001 10:04:15 PM PDT by knews_hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God_isa_Jew
Terrorism could be compared to a Christian heresy. The heresy is not in the words, but in the use one makes of the words. If terrorism is to be stamped out permanently, it will have to be Islam that does the stomping. The actions of America and its allies will destroy bin Laden's network but won't eliminate the terrorist movement completely even while making it nearly impossibly for terrorists to take effective action for a long time. Islam has to police its own for a permanent end to this.
16 posted on 10/11/2001 10:07:29 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
About freakin' time! Where the hell have they been for a damn MONTH?
17 posted on 10/11/2001 10:08:21 PM PDT by Tony in Hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
"The fatwa was issued in response to a request by Capt. Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, a Muslim chaplain in the United States Army, who sought guidance for Muslim military personnel uneasy about being deployed in the operation against Afghanistan."

You took the words right out of my mouth, Browardchad. And here I started reading this article thinking "Finally, an unequivocal condemnation by Moslem clerics."

I can see it now. Army regs supplemented by "fattwas." Come to think of it, the Pope hasn't exactly been gung ho about this, and, well, what will Jewish soldiers think about Sharon's pronouncements? Protestants might agree with Jerry Falwell that this is God's judgment and we better not interfere. We may yet have reason to be grateful for the professed pagans in uniform.

When I was in service (and with these words I guess I officially become an old crank) I seem to remember we were expected to follow orders and be ready to defeat the enemies of our country wherever and whoever they happened to be.

I think a sense of humor is going to be as important in the coming months as any other quality.
18 posted on 10/11/2001 10:08:58 PM PDT by SalukiLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I wonder if the main guy has criticised Palestinian martyr bombings that take out Israeli non-combatants, or if he sees all Israelis as combatants.
19 posted on 10/11/2001 10:09:30 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
"If the regulations and military code are such that you can imagine being given a lawful order that contradicts your religious moral imperatives, then you shouldn't go into the armed forces in the first place. In particular, a Muslim who believes that it is against Islam to ally with non-Muslims against other Muslims should not join the army of a non-Muslim country!"

Precisely -- I really don't care about the so-called "psychological victory" here -- the public request by a US Military Captain, from citizens of a foreign nation, to judge whether US military personnel can fight in this war, is an outrage. If they had any qualms about fighting other muslims, they should have requested immediate discharge as conscientious objectors (i.e. those willing to kill anyone but muslims in the defense of their country.)

20 posted on 10/11/2001 10:14:50 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson