Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Scholars Back Fight Against Terrorists
New York Times ^ | Friday, October 12, 2001 | LAURIE GOODSTEIN

Posted on 10/11/2001 9:22:17 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Muslim Scholars Back Fight Against Terrorists

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN

A panel of prominent Muslim scholars in the Middle East has issued a fatwa, or religious opinion, denouncing the terrorist attacks on the United States and saying it is the "duty" of Muslims to participate in the mission to apprehend the terrorists.

The primary purpose of the fatwa, released at a news conference yesterday in Washington, is to reassure Muslim soldiers in the American armed forces that they are permitted to fight other Muslims and Muslim countries to combat terrorism.

The fatwa was issued in response to a request by Capt. Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, a Muslim chaplain in the United States Army, who sought guidance for Muslim military personnel uneasy about being deployed in the operation against Afghanistan.

But several Muslim experts said the fatwa could have a broad impact beyond the United States by providing religious justification for Muslim nations to cooperate with the American military effort. Many Muslim counties have minimized the American presence within their borders or over their skies.

Fatwas are not binding, but this one is likely to have strong credibility throughout the Islamic world because among its five authors is a prominent scholar based in Qatar whose word is revered by many Muslims, both moderates and militants.

That scholar, Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, is regarded as an independent voice, unlike the many Islamic muftis and theologians who have been appointed by some Muslim governments. Far from pro-Western, Sheik Qaradawi has been a spiritual adviser to Muslim Brotherhood militants in Egypt, has harshly criticized the United States for supporting Israel and has condoned Palestinian suicide bombers.

"This fatwa is very significant. Yusuf Qaradawi is probably the most well-known legal authority in the whole Muslim world today," said Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, founder of the American Sufi Muslim Association, and an authority in Islamic jurisprudence. "The armed forces of other countries now have behind them a legal standing in the eyes of a noted legal authority to be part of the coalition against terrorism."

The fatwa, written in Arabic and translated into four pages of English, says: "We find it necessary to apprehend the true perpetrators of these crimes, as well as those who aid and abet them through incitement, financing or other support. They must be brought to justice in an impartial court of law and punish them appropriately, so that it could act as deterrent to them and to others like them who easily slay the lives of innocents, destroy properties and terrorize people. Hence, it's a duty on Muslims to participate in this effort with all possible means."

The fatwa condemns the terrorist attack, saying that "all Muslims ought to be united against all those who terrorize innocents," because the death of noncombatants is a clear violation of Islamic law.

The fatwa notes that American military action may also result in the death of innocent people, but that a Muslim soldier must "perform his duty in this fight despite the feeling of uneasiness of `fighting without discriminating.' " As a soldier, "he has no choice but to follow orders, otherwise his allegiance and loyalty to his country could be in doubt."

The fatwa was issued on Sept. 27 but not released until yesterday because it was being shown to other Muslim jurists in this country and overseas, said Dr. Taha Jabir Alalwani, chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, a group of Muslim scholars.

The fatwa is surprising because it appears to contradict other recent statements from Mr. Qaradawi.

In an interview on Sept. 16, on Al Jazeera television, the Arabic-language network based in Qatar, Mr. Qaradawi said, "A Muslim is forbidden from entering into an alliance with a non-Muslim against another Muslim." He called on Muslims to "fight the American military if we can, and if we cannot, we should fight the U.S. economically and politically."

It is not clear why Mr. Qaradawi has appeared to change his position.

The other authors of the fatwa include Haytham al-Khayyat, a scholar in Syria, and three Egyptian scholars who have also criticized American policy in Muslim countries: Tariq al-Bishri, a retired jurist, Muhammad S. al-Awa, a professor of law, and Fahmi Houaydi, a newspaper columnist.

It is too early to tell how the fatwa will be greeted in either the Muslim world, or among Muslims in the United States. Fatwas can be disseminated through speeches in mosques, Web sites and media coverage.

Not everyone welcomed this fatwa. Qaseem A. Uqdah, executive director of the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council, said he was outraged that such a fatwa was even sought.

Mr. Uqdah said the fatwa was a political statement of no help to enlisted Muslims, and should never have been sought because the scholars could have come to a completely different conclusion.

"Now you have opened a door for people to question, is this right or wrong," he said. "You'll have controversy looming about us just when we don't need that."

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: browardchad

Right On! Kick'em out if they can't obey orders!


21 posted on 10/11/2001 10:22:38 PM PDT by texson66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
the public request by a US Military Captain, from citizens of a foreign nation, to judge whether US military personnel can fight in this war, is an outrage. If they had any qualms about fighting other muslims, they should have requested immediate discharge as conscientious objectors

My point was they probably didn't have any qualms when they enlisted, but the many Muslim clerics reiterating this message might INDUCE such qualms, and it is better to counteract the message directly and reassure the servicemen than to let them become conscientious objectors.

22 posted on 10/11/2001 10:22:41 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
I really feel sorry for any wife, husband, mother or child of a non-muslim military man or woman, reading this. It's hard enough to say good-bye, knowing the danger they face, without worrying if their backs are covered -- or not -- due to the "religious" qualms of a fellow soldier, none of whom were forced to enlist.
23 posted on 10/11/2001 10:31:13 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: butter pecan fan
13 - "Translation: we've got a REAL fatwa, and bin Laden's isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Like I said, this is good news. "

This is true. What should have come out a month ago, has finally come out.

However, it is my opinion, that they finally realized, that they better get on the winning side, or they may find their own head coverings suddenly have laser red dots on them.

24 posted on 10/11/2001 10:36:02 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
That is not good. Seems like complete nonsense. I would be very reluctant to trust my life in combat to Muslim even if they were Americans. That fatwah thing just mud the waters more. For me it is a guarantee that they can turn on you when you need them more and it serves to give them cover so they can stay in the places they have among our troops. It solves nothing in the hour of truth it serves nothing. Even the liberal Muslim divides the world in two, them and the infidels. I see it very hard that they would turn on another Muslims no matter what.
25 posted on 10/11/2001 10:42:33 PM PDT by Minty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson