Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Put Gays in Mental Institutions
ABC News ^ | 4/12/02

Posted on 04/13/2002 3:05:08 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob

April 12 — A Mississippi judge has come under fire from gay rights groups after he wrote a letter to a local newspaper saying that gays and lesbians "should be put in some type of mental institute" rather than be given the right to marry.

Equality Mississippi, a statewide gay rights group, with the support of Lambda Legal, a nationwide gay rights organization, filed an ethics violation complaint today against George County Justice Court Judge Connie Wilkerson, arguing that the letter is evidence that the judge cannot be impartial.

"The letter is a clear statement of prejudice against gays and lesbians that calls into serious question whether the judge can decide cases fairly and impartially," Greg Nevins, a staff attorney in Lambda Legal's southern district office, said.

"In my opinion, gays and lesbians should be put in some type of mental institution instead of having a law like this passed for them," Wilkerson said in a letter to the George County Times that ran on March 28. The letter was referring to a California law that gives gay partners the same rights to file wrongful death suits as spouses or other family members have.

Wilkerson, 65, who has been a Justice Court judge for six years, said he was sorry his comments about gay people have stirred up so much controversy, but maintained that his views do not affect his performance on the bench.

"I wish somebody that's been offended would come up and let me show them what I think of them, the individual. I have no feelings against them," Wilkerson said. "I don't ask a fellow if they're a homosexual or a lady if she's a lesbian when they come in front of me. That has nothing to do with my judging."

‘I’m Trying to Help’

Wilkerson said he meant no harm with his letter.

"I've wrote letters throughout my life, and I probably just wasn't thinking about the problems that it might cost my fellow man," he said. "I'm sorry it's caused anybody any problems. I'm trying to help."

He said gay people should look for help with their "disease" in the Bible.

In his letter, Wilkerson wrote, "You need to know as I know, that God in heaven is not pleased with this, and I am sounding the alarm."

Jody Renaldo, the executive director of Equality Mississippi, said that Wilkerson should have kept his opinion to himself. Now that he has gone public with his feelings about homosexuals, he has violated the Mississippi Code of Judicial Conduct, which says judges should avoid "expressions of bias or prejudice," Renaldo said.

"Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there's a line that you just do not cross, especially when you're holding a judicial position," Renaldo said. "Because we pay his salary to sit on that bench, I think we deserve a little more respect than what he's giving us."

Invoking the Bible

As for Wilkerson's contention that he can serve on the bench fairly, Renaldo said the judge's words are ample evidence of the strength of his opinions, and make it inconceivable that he could be impartial on any case that involved sexual orientation that came before him.

"He's already given his opinion in advance about how he feels about gays and lesbians and how he feels about these rights issues," Renaldo said.

Wilkerson referred to a section from the Bible, Romans 1:31 and 1:32, where it says that those who break God's law and those who approve of those people are "worthy of death."

"The fact of the Bible scripture that he quotes in his letter really scares a lot of us," Renaldo said. "He's basically saying that we should be put to death, and those who approve of it should be put to death. … Here's a judge using scripture to promote the death of gays and lesbians."

In the face of the criticism, Wilkerson said he considers himself a fair and honest judge, but he said he probably made a mistake by writing the letter.

"I probably wouldn't write it, seeing as much trouble as it's caused people," he said. "I didn't know it was going to cause problems."

The filing of the ethics complaint comes on the eve of the first state gay pride rally in Mississippi since 1979. The event, organized by Equality Mississippi, was scheduled to be held in Jackson on Saturday.

The state has no law against discrimination based on sexual orientation, and there are no local ordinances barring such discrimination.


TOPICS: Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
The fact of the Bible scripture that he quotes in his letter really scares a lot of us...

For the same reason that cockroaches scurry when the light is turned on.

1 posted on 04/13/2002 3:05:08 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
What does "Lamda Legal" mean? I can't remember what "Lambda" stands for...
2 posted on 04/13/2002 3:23:56 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
It means homosexual.
3 posted on 04/13/2002 3:37:35 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
I don't think there's anything in the bible to the effect that homosexuality is a mental illness ...
4 posted on 04/13/2002 3:57:51 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Perhpas the judge should be fired for stupidity rather than bias ...
5 posted on 04/13/2002 3:58:41 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
...or perhaps applauded for a courageous act as a person.
6 posted on 04/13/2002 4:05:45 AM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
If you don't mind judges making mental health diagnosis then perhaps you would also like psychiatrists making legal decisions?
7 posted on 04/13/2002 4:09:29 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Either way it's still free speech. I applaud the judge for his moral convictions.
8 posted on 04/13/2002 4:19:34 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
"Because we pay his salary to sit on that bench, I think we deserve a little more respect than what he's giving us."

Drug dealers, murderers, robbers, rapists, and pedophiles also by proxy of public interest pay his salary. Guess they "deserve" more "respect" than he gives them too...

9 posted on 04/13/2002 4:21:18 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
There can be bad arguments for true conclusions. Suppose the judge has simply written "Homosexuality is wrong because God forbids it -- the Bible tells us so". That's one case. The same people would sue him, offering the same argument, and the same people here would defend his moral courage. But this case is interestingly different. The judge isn't making a moral claim. The judge is making a medical diagnosis. Moreover, he seems not to even understand the difference. It's his stupidity that's most worrisome. Even if you applaud his morals, you should be embarrassed by his argument.
10 posted on 04/13/2002 4:24:40 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
"I don't think there's anything in the bible to the effect that homosexuality is a mental illness..."

No, it's plainly called SIN and the soul that sins without repent will DIE, if not physically, then surely spiritually.

Lev. Ch 20 V 13 "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

11 posted on 04/13/2002 4:30:42 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
If you don't mind judges making mental health diagnosis then perhaps you would also like psychiatrists making legal decisions?

Your getting your strawman agrument mixed up here.

He said in the article he does ask a person their sexual preferences.

12 posted on 04/13/2002 4:36:04 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
I take it you're conceding the point then: This judge has no biblical authority for his medical diagnosis. What's interesting is that people who differ in their views on the morality or immorality of homosexuality can agree in his stupidity. Christians should be particularly concerned because his stupidity reinforces negative stereotypes.
13 posted on 04/13/2002 4:36:16 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
The worry about stupid people is that they can't escape their own stupidity. So whatever issue comes before this judge, even mundane questions about corporate securities law, we have to worry that he's too stupid to make the necessary distinctions or to make make appropriate inferences from the facts presented.
14 posted on 04/13/2002 4:40:13 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
I don't think there's anything in the bible to the effect that homosexuality is a mental illness ...

I think you are correct, I don't recall any such association. I do remember, however, several passages which refer to homosexuality as sinful, evil, and worthy of death. Imagine the homosexual outrage if the judge would have made those associations. If anything, he was gentle with his assertion.

The judge isn't making a moral claim. The judge is making a medical diagnosis.

You may be right on this one. I think he was making a clear case of their disease being just what most folks know it to be, a mental illness. One that has been shown to be treatable.

15 posted on 04/13/2002 4:42:47 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Drug dealers, murderers, robbers, rapists, and pedophiles also by proxy of public interest pay his salary. Guess they "deserve" more "respect" than he gives them too...

You're categorizing people with criminals merely because they're homosexual (and breaking no laws or harming anyone). This seems reasonable to you?

16 posted on 04/13/2002 4:45:34 AM PDT by Youngblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
"I take it you're conceding the point then: This judge has no biblical authority for his medical diagnosis."

Yes, the judge did overstep the bounds with the "medical" opinion from scripture, I agree.
Had he held an opinion from medical personnel, that would have been helpful to his arguement, but then based on the support of scripture stating homosexuality is detrimental to society, he offered an opinion for those to seek help - same as if an alcoholic or drug abuser would come before his bench and be told to seek help with their problem....
Az

17 posted on 04/13/2002 4:49:09 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
If it were a mental illness, it would be mean spirited for God to hold it against a person ... Most people who talk the sin-talk think of it as involving voluntary behavior, not chemical imbalances in the brain.
18 posted on 04/13/2002 4:49:15 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Failure to understand what could possibly count as evidence for a claim is a worrisome trait in a judge.
19 posted on 04/13/2002 4:51:52 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Most people who talk the sin-talk think of it as involving voluntary behavior, not chemical imbalances in the brain.

Unless they're Calvinists, in which case sin literally is something outside one's control, one's engaging in it having been foreordained by G-d for his greater glory. That's similar to a chemical imbalance in the brain.
20 posted on 04/13/2002 4:55:19 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson